11,143
edits
Question 26 (ABM) - Is it OK for a woman to wear pants?: Difference between revisions
Question 26 (ABM) - Is it OK for a woman to wear pants? (view source)
Revision as of 22:40, 15 January 2019
, 5 years ago→Question 26 - Is it OK for a woman to wear pants?
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Similarly, in Romans Paul is unconcerned if one considers every day to be alike (Rom. 14:5–6). He almost certainly thinks of the Sabbath here, but he reckons it to be a matter of inconsequence. Paul’s attitude of indifference relative to the Sabbath indicates that it is no longer normative. A new era has dawned in which the Mosaic covenant has passed away. This reading is confirmed by Ephesians 2:15. Jews and Gentiles in Christ are now one new man, for Christ has “[abolished] the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” In other words, one reason Jews and Gentiles are unified is that the requirements of the Mosaic covenant, which separated Jews from Gentiles, have become passé. | Similarly, in Romans Paul is unconcerned if one considers every day to be alike (Rom. 14:5–6). He almost certainly thinks of the Sabbath here, but he reckons it to be a matter of inconsequence. Paul’s attitude of indifference relative to the Sabbath indicates that it is no longer normative. A new era has dawned in which the Mosaic covenant has passed away. This reading is confirmed by Ephesians 2:15. Jews and Gentiles in Christ are now one new man, for Christ has “[abolished] the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” In other words, one reason Jews and Gentiles are unified is that the requirements of the Mosaic covenant, which separated Jews from Gentiles, have become passé. | ||
'''Shalom, | '''My question is - What gives William Branham the right to go against the clear teachings of Paul and to drag one of the Mosaic laws back into the new covenant?''' | ||
Shalom, | |||
BTS | BTS | ||