Jump to content

The Houston Photograph: Difference between revisions

Line 54: Line 54:
===The Light Struck the Lens===
===The Light Struck the Lens===


If, as George J. Lacy confirmed in his report on the photograph that light struck the negative, then it is hard to understand how no one else in the auditorium saw the light above William Branham's head.  But [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights.png|left|Another example of floodlights]]if the light was, in fact, a bank of floodlights then light did pass through the lens and did strike the negative.  Was the actual reason that no one noticed the "pillar of fire" was that they all saw it for what it really was - one of the flood lights in the Sam Houston Coliseum.
If, as George J. Lacy confirmed in his report on the photograph that light struck the negative, then it is hard to understand how no one else in the auditorium saw the light above William Branham's head.  But [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights.png|left|Another example of floodlights]]if the light was, in fact, a bank of floodlights then light did pass through the lens and did strike the negative.  Was the actual reason that no one noticed the "pillar of fire" was that they all saw it for what it really was - one of the flood lights in the Sam Houston Coliseum?


If the "pillar of fire" was an actual light source above William Branham's head that showed up on the negative, why doesn't the photo look more like the edited version the right?
If the "pillar of fire" was an actual light source above William Branham's head that showed up on the negative, why doesn't the photo look more like the edited version the right?