11,143
edits
William Branham and the nature of God: Difference between revisions
William Branham and the nature of God (view source)
Revision as of 18:02, 11 December 2020
, 3 years ago→What did William Braham believe and teach?
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=What did William Braham believe and teach?= | =What did William Braham believe and teach?= | ||
William Branham initially believed in the doctrine of the Trinity. However, he eventually came to believe that the doctrine of the Trinity was completely false. | William Branham initially believed in the doctrine of the Trinity. However, he eventually came to believe that the doctrine of the Trinity was completely false. He also rejected Oneness theology. So what did he believe? | ||
The problem is that if there is no Trinity, where does that leave Jesus? Here are the choices: | The problem is that if there is no Trinity, where does that leave Jesus? Here are the choices: | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
#Jesus is a lower god. (Arianism) | #Jesus is a lower god. (Arianism) | ||
#Jesus is another god. (Tri-theism) | #Jesus is another god. (Tri-theism) | ||
#Jesus is | #Jesus is the Son of God but is also God the Father (Sabellianism or Oneness) | ||
#Jesus is just a man and was not deity. (Nestorianism) | #Jesus is just a man and was not deity. (Nestorianism) | ||
#Jesus was born a man but was adopted by God the Father when he was baptized (Adoptionism) | |||
These points clearly answer the question, “If the Trinity is not true, then where does that leave Jesus?” It leaves Jesus as | These points clearly answer the question, “If the Trinity is not true, then where does that leave Jesus?” It leaves Jesus as someone other than what the Bible teaches. This should establish why the Trinity is an essential of the faith and cannot be denied by anyone who calls themselves a Christian. It is good to point these out to someone who says the doctrine of the Trinity is not essential or primary. | ||
Let's examine closely what William Branham taught. | Let's examine closely what William Branham taught. | ||
| Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
:''The same God the Father was made manifest in flesh, and now in the Holy Spirit. That's the reason the baptism is in the Name of Father, Son, Holy Ghost (See?) '''the Trinity'''--the Trinity, not three gods, but '''three persons in one God'''...<ref>THE TESTIMONY OF JESUS CHRIST CHICAGO.IL 53-0829</ref> | :''The same God the Father was made manifest in flesh, and now in the Holy Spirit. That's the reason the baptism is in the Name of Father, Son, Holy Ghost (See?) '''the Trinity'''--the Trinity, not three gods, but '''three persons in one God'''...<ref>THE TESTIMONY OF JESUS CHRIST CHICAGO.IL 53-0829</ref> | ||
:''Now, of course, we people today, '''we believe that there’s three, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost is the three persons of the one true God.''' It’s three offices, not three Gods. But that same… Listen now, we think that was ridiculous in the Catholic church, but we brought it right down here at Pentecost and tore yourselves to pieces with it—set up another organization, started something else.<ref>William Branham, 57-0309B - I Will Restore, para. 32</ref> | |||
In his early ministry, William Branham was very inclusive and extended open arms to both Trinitarians and Oneness believers (see the vision of the [[Plum and Apple Trees]]. | In his early ministry, William Branham was very inclusive and extended open arms to both Trinitarians and Oneness believers (see the vision of the [[Plum and Apple Trees]]. | ||
| Line 83: | Line 86: | ||
[[Nestorianism]] is basically the doctrine that Jesus existed as two persons, the man Jesus and the divine Son of God, rather than as a unified person. William Branham's teaching on the nature of Christ was clearly tainted by Nestorianism. It is even more clearly developed in the teachings of Lee Vayle. | [[Nestorianism]] is basically the doctrine that Jesus existed as two persons, the man Jesus and the divine Son of God, rather than as a unified person. William Branham's teaching on the nature of Christ was clearly tainted by Nestorianism. It is even more clearly developed in the teachings of Lee Vayle. | ||
:''God was in Him. '''He was a man, but He was a—a dual Person. One, He was a man; the Spirit in Him was God.'''<ref>William | :''And with such a shifting condition as we’re in today, how can faith rest itself? You got to come back to the Bible, back to the truth. And when Jesus, a carpenter’s Son, physically speaking, when He come to the earth here that’s all He was known of, and the day that when John baptized Him, God a vindicated Him. God spoke from the heavens. John saw Him coming in the form a dove, and said, “'''This is My beloved Son in Whom I’m pleased to dwell.'''” The right translation there is, “In whom I am pleased to dwell in.” Jesus immediately anointed with God, '''He was just a man till that time, but now He becomes the God-man.'''<ref>William Branham, 55-0806 - Jesus Christ The Same Yesterday, Today, And Forever, para. 30</ref> | ||
:''He said, “For My…” That’s the reason people couldn’t understand Him. Sometime it was Christ speaking… or was the Son speaking. Other times it was the Father speaking. '''He was a dual Person. He was one Man, the Son. God was in him, which was tabernacling in Him.''' But what did He do? Did He go around saying, “I’m the Healer.” Very contrary, He said, “I’m not the Healer.” He said, “It isn’t Me that doth the works; it’s My Father that dwelleth in Me.”<ref>William Branham, 56-0429 - Jehovah-Jireh, para. 53</ref> | |||
:''God was in Him. '''He was a man, but He was a—a dual Person. One, He was a man; the Spirit in Him was God.'''<ref>William Branham, 59-1129 - Let Us See God</ref> | |||
:'''''The Spirit left Him''', in the Garden of Gethsemane. '''He had to die, a man'''. Remember, friends, He didn’t have to do that. That was God. '''God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh'''. And '''He didn’t…If He’d a went up there, as God, He’d have never died that kind of death; can’t kill God.''' But He didn’t have to do it.<ref>William Marrion Branham, 65-0418M - It Is The Rising Of The Sun, para. 241</ref> | :'''''The Spirit left Him''', in the Garden of Gethsemane. '''He had to die, a man'''. Remember, friends, He didn’t have to do that. That was God. '''God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh'''. And '''He didn’t…If He’d a went up there, as God, He’d have never died that kind of death; can’t kill God.''' But He didn’t have to do it.<ref>William Marrion Branham, 65-0418M - It Is The Rising Of The Sun, para. 241</ref> | ||