William Branham's Teachings on Water Baptism: Difference between revisions

Line 62: Line 62:
The Bible should be simply understood and therefore it seems quite obvious that William Branham has interpreted the scripture to say something that it clearly doesn't.  The phrase "Lord Jesus Christ" appears 6 times in the book of Acts so it would have been very easy for Luke to have stated clearly that people were to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.  But since he didn't, it is not possible to make that claim.
The Bible should be simply understood and therefore it seems quite obvious that William Branham has interpreted the scripture to say something that it clearly doesn't.  The phrase "Lord Jesus Christ" appears 6 times in the book of Acts so it would have been very easy for Luke to have stated clearly that people were to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.  But since he didn't, it is not possible to make that claim.


thereby proving one of the fundamental doctrines of William Branham's message to be flawed.
What is clear is that, from the historical record, there did not appear to be an emphasis on the exact formula of baptism. thereby proving one of the fundamental doctrines of William Branham's message to be flawed.


=Another Challenge from William Branham=
=Another Challenge from William Branham=