11,141
edits
What were the Seven Visions?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
William Branham claimed on many occasions that there were people in the congregations who were present in the meeting that he held in 1933 on Meigs Ave in which he explained the visions and the 1977 prediction e.g. in reference to that meeting: | William Branham claimed on many occasions that there were people in the congregations who were present in the meeting that he held in 1933 on Meigs Ave in which he explained the visions and the 1977 prediction e.g. in reference to that meeting: | ||
::And here comes around and shows. And then I predicted. I never said the Lord told me that, but, standing that morning in the church, I said, ìThe way progressÖî I got back to one end of their wall, and run to the other end of the wall. I said, ìThe way progress is going on, Iíll predict that the timeÖI donít know why Iím saying it. But I predict that thatíll all happen between right now, 1933, and 1977.<ref>''Seventieth Week of Daniel 1961''</ref> | ::And here comes around and shows. And then I predicted. I never said the Lord told me that, but, standing that morning in the church, I said, ìThe way progressÖî I got back to one end of their wall, and run to the other end of the wall. I said, ìThe way progress is going on, Iíll predict that the timeÖI donít know why Iím saying it. But I predict that thatíll all happen between right now, 1933, and 1977.î<ref>''Seventieth Week of Daniel 1961''</ref> | ||
He is talking about the 1933 meeting. But there are no testimonials from that meeting of what he said about the visions. There is no list of the visions or details of their content. Again, we are asked to accept that there were visions and that they were related to a congregation, but with no corroborating evidence. | He is talking about the 1933 meeting. But there are no testimonials from that meeting of what he said about the visions. There is no list of the visions or details of their content. Again, we are asked to accept that there were visions and that they were related to a congregation, but with no corroborating evidence. | ||