The Municipal Bridge Vision: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:


So in 1960, 30 years after the fact, William Branham told the story and no one noticed.  As that was the first time on record that he told it in Jeffersonville, it is really not surprising that no one would have questioned him on it.
So in 1960, 30 years after the fact, William Branham told the story and no one noticed.  As that was the first time on record that he told it in Jeffersonville, it is really not surprising that no one would have questioned him on it.
==Problem 7: Why didn't William Branham warn anyone?==
If William Branham knew that people were going to die in the construction of the bridge, why didn't he attempt to warn anyone?
Put yourself in William Branham's shoes.  What would you have done if you had a vision of 16 men dying in a construction accident on a bridge that they then started building years later.  Wouldn't you have warned everyone?
This vision is suspect simply because William Branham never attempted to warn anyone.  In fact, he seemed quite proud of the fact that he foretold their deaths (which in fact never happened).


=Excuses for the failed vision brought on by [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]]=
=Excuses for the failed vision brought on by [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]]=