The Municipal Bridge Vision: Difference between revisions

Line 123: Line 123:
Trying to tie the Municipal Bridge Vision to the Ohio Flood is virtually impossible unless you are willing to admit that most of the vision was completely wrong but then, doesn't that still create a problem with Deuteronomy 18:22?
Trying to tie the Municipal Bridge Vision to the Ohio Flood is virtually impossible unless you are willing to admit that most of the vision was completely wrong but then, doesn't that still create a problem with Deuteronomy 18:22?


=The vision properly relates to the Sydney Harbour Bridge in Australia=
==The vision properly relates to the Sydney Harbour Bridge in Australia==


[[Cognitive Dissonance]] drives people to find explanations, even if things have to be stretched beyond the realms of reasonableness.  The thought that William Branham was not a prophet is just not possible for their minds to deal with.
[[Cognitive Dissonance]] drives people to find explanations, even if things have to be stretched beyond the realms of reasonableness.  The thought that William Branham was not a prophet is just not possible for their minds to deal with.
Line 135: Line 135:
The issues that proponents of this wild theory don't consider is the following:
The issues that proponents of this wild theory don't consider is the following:


*In the FIRST recorded retelling of the vision in 1948 (48-0302), William Branham specifically refers to the municipal bridge.
#In the FIRST recorded retelling of the vision in 1948 (48-0302), William Branham specifically refers to the municipal bridge.
#While 16 people did die in the construction of the Sydney Harbour bridge, only 2 of these people died from falling off the bridge.  William Branham clearly stated that he saw 16 people fall of the bridge.
#While 16 people did die in the construction of the Sydney Harbour bridge, only 2 of these people died from falling off the bridge.  William Branham clearly stated that he saw 16 people fall of the bridge.
#William Branham stated that he had the vision when he was 5 or 6 years old when he had the vision, so 22 years later would put the Sydney Bridge deaths much too early in time.
#William Branham stated that he had the vision when he was 5 or 6 years old when he had the vision, so 22 years later would put the Sydney Bridge deaths much too early in time.
#William Branham clearly stated that he saw the bridge spanning the river but the Sydney Harbour bridge goes across a narrow part of the harbour (i.e. salt water and not part of a river).


=A Big Question=
=A Big Question=