Template:Bad Interpretation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[[Women were designed by Satan|Were Women were designed by Satan?]] | *[[Women were designed by Satan|Were Women were designed by Satan?]] | ||
*[[Enoch and Noah|Were Enoch and Noah alive at the same time?]] | *[[Enoch and Noah|Were Enoch and Noah alive at the same time?]] | ||
*[[Michael the Archangel|Is Jesus really Michael the Archangel?]] | |||
You are currently on the article that is in bold.<br> | You are currently on the article that is in bold.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 5 May 2017
The following is a list of interpretive issues that William Branham got horribly wrong. this is important because most message followers hold him out as an infallible interpreter of scripture. If we want to know what a passage of the Bible actually means, William Branham is the best source on all counts.
In fact, message preachers generally encourage message followers that encounter a passage in scripture that seems to be at odds with William branham'sinterpretation to simply put it "on the shelf" until God reveals to them why William bRanham has the correct view.
But here are a number of biblical issues that William Branham seems to have messed up badly:
- Did God change Saul's name to Paul?
- Elijah and Elisha did pray
- Marriage and Divorce
- Was King Saul the people’s choice by democratic vote?
- Can you lose your salvation?
- How hard do lillies work?
- Did John weep for joy or because no one was worthy?
- Were Women were designed by Satan?
- Were Enoch and Noah alive at the same time?
- Is Jesus really Michael the Archangel?
You are currently on the article that is in bold.