Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions

Line 54: Line 54:
Is this a prophecy that is sufficiently vague that it will almost certainly be fulfilled?   
Is this a prophecy that is sufficiently vague that it will almost certainly be fulfilled?   


The details of this prophecy seem intentionally vague.  The woman is a president or a vice president or a dictator or the Catholic church or any other thing that might be symbolically portrayed as a powerful woman.   
The details of this prophecy seem intentionally ambiguous.  The woman is a president or a vice president or a dictator or the Catholic church or any other thing that might be symbolically portrayed as a powerful woman.   


One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power, and predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will one day drive themselves. That doesn't take a prophet.
One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power. Predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will one day drive themselves. That doesn't take a prophet and William Branham was not the first to predict any of these things.


Women obtained the legal right to vote nationally in the US in 1920.  William Branham stated he received this prophecy in 1933.  Given the way history was moving it was not hard to believe in 1933 that a woman would eventually be president or at least vice president.  If the prophecies were actually made in 1933… and there is some doubt about that… then to see a woman as vice president some 87 years later is not an astounding prophecy.
Women obtained the legal right to vote nationally in the US in 1920.  William Branham stated he received this prophecy in 1933.  Given the way history was moving it was not hard to believe in 1933 that a woman would eventually be president or vice president.  If the prophecies were actually made in 1933… and there is some doubt about that… then to see a woman as vice president some 87 years later is not an astounding prophecy.


As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that this prophecy qualifies as being sufficiently vague as to almost certainly be fulfilled at some time.
As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that this prophecy qualifies as being sufficiently fuzzy as to almost certainly be fulfilled at some time in the future.


===Is this a prophecy which William Branham takes from scripture?===
===Is this a prophecy which William Branham takes from scripture?===