11,141
edits
Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions
→Classifying William Branham's prophecies
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
#Based on common scientific knowledge and/or common sense. | #Based on common scientific knowledge and/or common sense. | ||
This is true even if you allow multiple variations of the same prophecy over time, which is in itself problematic. One would think that a would-be prophet who often mentioned his "prophecies" after their supposed fulfillment would at least have some wins to debate, but strangely enough, this isn't the case. In the matter of the woman coming to power, it is | This is true even if you allow multiple variations of the same prophecy over time, which is in itself problematic. One would think that a would-be prophet who often mentioned his "prophecies" after their supposed fulfillment would at least have some wins to debate, but strangely enough, this isn't the case. In the matter of the woman coming to power, it is a combination of Category 2 and 3. | ||
One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power, and predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will oneday drive themselves. As they say, doesn't take a prophet. | One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power, and predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will oneday drive themselves. As they say, doesn't take a prophet. | ||