11,141
edits
Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions
→Classifying William Branham's prophecies
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Speaking of the purple dress, I think there is ample evidence to support that Branham was using the purple of royalty to symbolize the "purple curtain" (Roman Catholic Church), though in a debate I would happily concede the point as the validity of the prophecy hardly rests on that one detail. Branham himself repeatedly stressed how every single detail of a vision must be just exactly right. | Speaking of the purple dress, I think there is ample evidence to support that Branham was using the purple of royalty to symbolize the "purple curtain" (Roman Catholic Church), though in a debate I would happily concede the point as the validity of the prophecy hardly rests on that one detail. Branham himself repeatedly stressed how every single detail of a vision must be just exactly right. | ||
Even more importantly, even if every single detail of this vision were undeniably perfect, (it's not), that wouldn't negate the insurmountable case against him as a false prophet otherwise. | Even more importantly, even if every single detail of this vision were undeniably perfect, (it's not), that wouldn't negate the insurmountable case against him as a false prophet otherwise. If Kamala Harris's term comes and goes with little drama, we expect message followers to simply re-assign this "prophecy" to the next woman candidate, just as they did with Hillary Clinton. If she happens to not wear purple, well, I expect they'll leave that detail out. After all, there are multiple versions of this prophecy/prediction to pick from. And if Joe Biden is in some way incapacitated or dies and Harris actually becomes president? Fasten your seatbelts, the noise from the message preachers will become even louder. | ||
===The Multiple Versions of the Prophecy=== | ===The Multiple Versions of the Prophecy=== | ||