11,143
edits
Question 4 (BM2) - The Trinity and other issues: Difference between revisions
Question 4 (BM2) - The Trinity and other issues (view source)
Revision as of 19:00, 3 March 2019
, 5 years ago→Progressive Revelation
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 342: | Line 342: | ||
I say.....My responses were based directly on your statements...which also were filled with misstatements along with mischaracterizations. I will base this response on your statements...so it could also be lengthy. | I say.....My responses were based directly on your statements...which also were filled with misstatements along with mischaracterizations. I will base this response on your statements...so it could also be lengthy. | ||
To begin with...you didn't directly address the questions I posed concerning Abraham....a noted Prophet of GOD and his grievous errors.....progressively followed by GOD's gentle correction and reassertion of the promise. | |||
You sidestep to Gideon...who is not in the line of Prophets and then ramble about the fleecing incident. That my friend....has no connection with Abraham losing his Prophet of GOD position...status or place for disobeying..... denying and laughing in the Face of GOD. Gideon did none of those things...so I don't think comparing camels to spaceships is relevant to the subject. Besides..... even Gideon's position as a Judge was progressive.... in every sense of the word! He was guided by progressive instructions to his ultimate victories.....PERIOD! The point of the subject had to do with what constitutes a Prophet of GOD and whether his errors.... disqualify him from being GOD's Prophet. | |||
==Progressive Revelation== | ==Progressive Revelation== | ||
| Line 392: | Line 392: | ||
You use his statements and then put your spin on them and I read the same statements and understand exactly what he meant. Not one place can you show us a teaching...where he taught the Denominational TRINITARIAN version of the Godhead....with 3 separate persons making one god. | You use his statements and then put your spin on them and I read the same statements and understand exactly what he meant. Not one place can you show us a teaching...where he taught the Denominational TRINITARIAN version of the Godhead....with 3 separate persons making one god. | ||
If I said....depending on the audience being dealt with..... that GOD the Father was the 1st...2nd and 3rd Person of the Godhead...it would be totally correct....if the person listening knew what I meant by the statement. To another filled with the spirit of criticism....it would be confusion. It's just a matter of placing the attributes of the one person GOD...... in the correct manifestation and/or timeframe. Personally.....I think you are somewhat void concerning the Revelation of Godhead.... as taught all the way through by Brother Branham. Otherwise you wouldn't use your spin on his wording...trying to make him say something that he didn't believe. | |||
Can you please show us where what we showed you wasn’t in what Branham taught? He taught those things, right?? Unbelievable. | Can you please show us where what we showed you wasn’t in what Branham taught? He taught those things, right?? Unbelievable. | ||