11,143
edits
Question 31 (ABM) - What is the significance of a Seven-Lettered Name?: Difference between revisions
Question 31 (ABM) - What is the significance of a Seven-Lettered Name? (view source)
Revision as of 18:30, 11 April 2020
, 4 years ago→Follow up question
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
Kind Regards, | Kind Regards, | ||
ABM | |||
=Follow up question= | |||
[[Image:William marvin branham draft card.jpg|250px|thumb|right]] | |||
Recently, the first official government document containing William Branham's legal name was discovered - his 1940 draft card from the United States Defense Security Service. Even more curious is the fact that William Branham's signature appears on the form. His signature is an acknowledgment that his legal name, the name given to him at birth, was William Marvin Branham. So his middle name was Marvin and not Marrion. | |||
It is also interesting to note that William Branham gave no indication of his middle name in any sermon until March 24, 1963: | |||
:''There is many Branhams, if you want to talk about me personally, but I’m—I’m the one William Marrion Branham. That—that’s me. But there’s many other William Branhams, and so forth, around.<ref>William Branham, 63-0324M - Questions And Answers On The Seals, para. 181</ref> | |||
William Branham doesn't spell his middle name in the sermon. There is no indication where the spelling of his middle name came from as it appears not to have appeared in any written form until after his death. | |||
One must, therefore, draw the conclusion that William Branham's actual middle name was "Marvin." To convince his followers that his name had spiritual connotations (his first, middle and surname each had seven letters), he changed his middle name to Marrion. This further illustrates William Branham's questionable integrity and his overwhelming desire to make himself look like a prophet. | |||
I do agree that William Branham birthed a movement. However, from its outset it was tiny and today is rapidly losing relevancy. Thirty-five years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Christians were already known to the Roman emperor Nero and many Christians had already given their life for the Gospel (including Peter and Paul). However, almost fifty-five years after the death of William Branham, his movement is almost unknown on a worldwide basis. | |||
It is true that there are small groups of message followers around the world (with a few notable exceptions in a couple of African countries), but these small groups are generally shrinking as knowledge of the problems related to William Branham and his message becomes more accessible. For this reason, we are aware that many message ministers are decrying their shrinking congregations as a sign of the "falling away" referred to in 2 Thessalonians 2:3. Of course, their shrinking congregations have nothing to do with that passage and everything to do with the spreading knowledge of the failure of William Branham's prophetic ministry. | |||
Again, we would simply ask the question - Why am I required to follow William Branham when his credibility is so questionable? | |||