106
edits
Question 23 (ABM) - Can we ignore the plain reading of Deuteronomy 18:20-22?: Difference between revisions
Question 23 (ABM) - Can we ignore the plain reading of Deuteronomy 18:20-22? (view source)
Revision as of 22:23, 13 April 2021
, 3 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
#David Mamalis, who threatened Spoken Word Publications (now Voice of God) with legal action over the tapes being in the public domain, published his own set of message books based on the tapes he had. These do not significantly disagree with those that have been published by Jeffersonville. | #David Mamalis, who threatened Spoken Word Publications (now Voice of God) with legal action over the tapes being in the public domain, published his own set of message books based on the tapes he had. These do not significantly disagree with those that have been published by Jeffersonville. | ||
#Neither Junior Jackson or | #Neither Junior Jackson or Orman Neville published their set of tapes. It would be quite easy to publish their "version" of the tapes on the internet as MP3 files but this has never been done. As a result, I cannot take this criticism seriously. | ||
As a result, I must conclude that Deuteronomy 18:19-22 requiries William Branham to be viewed as a false prophet. | As a result, I must conclude that Deuteronomy 18:19-22 requiries William Branham to be viewed as a false prophet. | ||