106
edits
Question 23 (ABM) - Can we ignore the plain reading of Deuteronomy 18:20-22?: Difference between revisions
Question 23 (ABM) - Can we ignore the plain reading of Deuteronomy 18:20-22? (view source)
Revision as of 22:17, 13 April 2021
, 3 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 287: | Line 287: | ||
David Mamalis, who threatened Spoken Word Publications (now Voice of God) with legal action over the tapes being in the public domain, published his own set of message books based on the tapes he had. These do not significantly disagree with those that have been published by Jeffersonville. | David Mamalis, who threatened Spoken Word Publications (now Voice of God) with legal action over the tapes being in the public domain, published his own set of message books based on the tapes he had. These do not significantly disagree with those that have been published by Jeffersonville. | ||
Neither Junior Jackson or | Neither Junior Jackson or Orman Neville published their set of tapes. It would be quite easy to publish their "version" of the tapes on the internet as MP3 files but this has never been done. As a result, I cannot take this criticism seriously. | ||
ABM: I would not use this argument to try and say a given prophecy was altered (though perhaps it was inserted on tape at a different time than originally given). I am not aware of any prophecy that was altered. My statement on this point was in regards to some statements in 1956 which were time sensitive in nature. David Mamalis's collection of original tapes is very small, he was primarily using many of the same source tapes VGR used, a large portion of which came from Leo Mercer. Neville died in 1974, so his ability to do much was limited. Jackson did not issue corrected tapes, but he did issue in his magazine a written list of the tapes he knew were altered and a description of the alterations that were made. He claimed to have accurate original tapes too. | ABM: I would not use this argument to try and say a given prophecy was altered (though perhaps it was inserted on tape at a different time than originally given). I am not aware of any prophecy that was altered. My statement on this point was in regards to some statements in 1956 which were time sensitive in nature. David Mamalis's collection of original tapes is very small, he was primarily using many of the same source tapes VGR used, a large portion of which came from Leo Mercer. Neville died in 1974, so his ability to do much was limited. Jackson did not issue corrected tapes, but he did issue in his magazine a written list of the tapes he knew were altered and a description of the alterations that were made. He claimed to have accurate original tapes too. | ||