11,143
edits
Q&A:Plagiarism: Difference between revisions
→Red Herring Arguments
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Red Herring Arguments= | =Red Herring Arguments= | ||
Message believers have to reconcile what they believe (that William Branham was a biblical prophet) with the fact that William Branham plagiarized some of his more significant teachings. The easiest way to do this is to trivialize William Branham's plagiarism in such a way that a message follower will feel comfortable ignoring it. | |||
In this case, the "red herring" is an issue that is introduced to deliberately distract a person from William Branham's plagiarism. It is an attempt to lead a person towards a false conclusion. A red herring might be intentionally used (particularly where there are no real arguments against the issue), or it could be inadvertently used during an argument as a result of poor logic. | |||
[[Failed Prophecies|Voice of God Recordings explanation as to why William Branham's failed prophecies are not important]] relies completely on the use of red herring arguments. | |||
In the case of William Branham's plagiarism, the case is made that there are examples of plagiarism in the Bible. As a result, we should also ignore William Branham's plagiarism. | |||
Our refutation of the charge of plagiarism in the Bible is found below. However, even if we were unable to refute this claim, it is completely irrelevant to the issue of whether William Branham was guilty of plagiarism. Each individual accusation must be dealt with separately and considered on its own merits. | |||
=Email #1= | =Email #1= | ||