Lilies Do Not Toil: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
William Branham practiced a [[Lazy Theology|lazy theology]] which we demonstrate in other articles on this website.  But at times, he also completely contradicted what the Bible said. Here are a couple of examples:
{{Top of Page}}


=Lilies work hard=
William Branham completely contradicted the Bible at times.  Here is one example:


==What the Bible says==
==What the Bible says==
Line 43: Line 43:
This is a total contradiction to what Jesus said.
This is a total contradiction to what Jesus said.


=John Wept for Joy=
{{Bottom of Page}}
 
==What the Bible says==
 
Revelation 5:4-5
 
:''And '''I wept much, ''because'' no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon'''.  And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.
 
The Bible says that John was weeping out of sadness.  One of the elders consoles him by saying "Weep not because the Lion of Judah will open the book.
 
==What William Branham said==
 
:''And when the... John wept. Now, someone, as I said last week, they said, "John wept because that he could find nobody worthy." '''It wasn't that.  A man under the influence of the Holy Ghost wouldn't weep for that'''. Thought that, "'Cause he wasn't worthy," maybe John himself wasn't worthy. There's nobody worthy. But he didn't weep because of that.
 
:''I believe '''he was weeping for joy''' because that he had seen the whole plan of redemption was wrote in this Book here. It wasn't because there wasn't nobody worthy, because there stood a Lamb right there was worthy. So he was weeping there, he said, "Oh, Glory to God." Listen at him directly when he goes to shouting. Now, but we find him here weeping because that he was so happy because that the Lamb had taken the Book for the--out of the hand of Him that set upon the throne.''<ref>REV.CHAP.5.PART.2 JEFF.IN ROJC 747-793 61-0618</ref>
 
This is again in total contradiction to what scripture said.  William Branham ignored the plain meaning of scripture.  His theology cannot be trusted.
 
=Other examples=
 
*[[Christians that were required to believe Satanic doctrine]]
*[[King Saul - The Peoples' Choice?]]
*[[The Importance of a Seven-Lettered Name]]
*[[Marriage and Divorce]]
 
=References=
 
<References/>