King George VI: Difference between revisions

Line 39: Line 39:
The lack of any evidence does raise significant question as to whether there was a visit.
The lack of any evidence does raise significant question as to whether there was a visit.


While the public was informed of the King's health problems, there has '''never''' been any indication from any source that the King suffered from multiple sclerosis.
While the public was informed of the King's health problems, there was '''never''' been any indication from any source that the King suffered from multiple sclerosis.


Depending on which sources are given the most credibility, different people may arrive at different conclusions as to which disease William Branham actually prayed for.  However, in the end that issue has little relevance.   
Depending on which sources are given the most credibility, different people may arrive at different conclusions as to which disease William Branham actually prayed for.  However, in the end that issue has little relevance.   


What is striking is that William Branham pronounced the king  
What is striking is that William Branham pronounced the king healed after his visit in April 1950, but the King's health was seen to have noticeably deteriorated immediately after a public appearance he made in early May 1950.
 
Why would William Branham pray for him for mulitple sclerosis when he had been diagnosed with severe heart disease


==Quotes==
==Quotes==