11,141
edits
Fifth Seal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Top of Page}} | {{Top of Page}} | ||
{{7 Seals}} | {{7 Seals}} | ||
=Examination of the Fifth Seal= | |||
William Branham’s essential interpretation of the fifth seal is that the souls under the altar represented past Jewish martyrs and their fellow servants and brethren were Jewish martyers who would die during the tribulation. He basis for saying they were Jewish martyrs was the fact that the fifth seal was in the sixth chapter of revelation, but the rapture of the church had happened in the fourth chapter. | |||
: | William Branham explained as follows: | ||
:''Now, | :''Now, for they, at this time, if you notice, this Fifth Seal being opened, see, the Church is gone. It just can’t be, the souls under the—the early Church. Now, now, please, if you ever did give this attention now, ’cause this is a great controver… controversy, so I want you to listen real close now. And you got your papers, and things to write with. Now, I want you to notice. Now, these cannot be them souls. Because, the—the souls of the—of the righteous, martyred, and the righteous people, the Church, the Bride, has done been took up, so they wouldn’t be under the altar. They would be in Glory, with the Bride. Now watch. For, they are gone in the Rapture, in the 4th chapter of Revelation. They was taken up. Now, who are these souls, then? That’s the next thing. Who are they, then, if they’re not the early Church? This is Israel that’s to be saved as a nation, all them that are predestinated. That’s Israel. That’s Israel, itself.<ref>William Branham, 63-0322 - The Fifth Seal</ref> | ||
The | On the following pages you will find the fifth seal as seen in The Book of Revelation, published in 1919 by Clareance Larkin. You will find they give the exact same essential interpretation of the seal. | ||
Larkin taught the rapture occurred in the fourth chapter of Revelation as you will see on the next page. | |||
=Scripture= | =Scripture= | ||
| Line 98: | Line 97: | ||
'''Why is he calling on the Lamb of God the way a Magician would call out to a spirit behind a curtain? | '''Why is he calling on the Lamb of God the way a Magician would call out to a spirit behind a curtain? | ||
===Why is William Branham always pointing to himself?=== | |||
In his sermon on the Fifth Seal, William Branham stated: | |||
:''You know, a angel is a messenger, but do you know the messenger was a prophet? You believe that? Let's prove it. Revelation 22: let's see if it was a eagle. See, he was… Sure he was an angel; he was a messenger. But it was a prophet that revealed this whole Book of Revelation to him. Revelation the 22nd chapter and the 19th verse, I believe that's right if I've got it written down here: 22:19. I may be wrong. No, 22:9. That's what it is, I was looking at 22:9. That's right. Oh, yes, here. | |||
:''Then said he to me, See thou do it not:… (No true prophet would be worshipped or messenger of any kind. See, see?)… Then said he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them that keeps the sayings of this book: worship God. | |||
:''Now, watch. Isn't the prophet that we're looking to come, some man anointed with the—with the Spirit like Elijah? It won't be Elijah, of course, but it'll be a man like that will come down, and his very ministry is to send, to restore back to this fallen people through these denominational twists, back to the original faith of the fathers.<ref>William Branham, 63-0322 - The Fifth Seal</ref> | |||
The KJV is the easiest to be twisted; therefore it is often used by self-appointed "prophets". Here is a more accurate translation: | |||
:''But he said to me, “Do not do that. I am a fellow servant of yours and of your brethren the prophets and of those who heed the words of this book. Worship God.”<ref>New American Standard Bible: 1995 Update (LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation, 1995), Re 22:9.</ref> | |||
This Angel simply compared himself to other servants, prophets, and ALL WHO OBEY what's written in the book; thus declaring that he must not be worshipped. Scripture never says that this angel is a man and never states that he is a prophet who walked on the earth either in the past or future. Why would William Branham think that this was referring to him? Doesn't that come across as being just a little presumptuous? | |||
{{Bottom of Page}} | {{Bottom of Page}} | ||
[[Category:Doctrines]] | [[Category:Doctrines]] | ||