Credibility: Difference between revisions

167 bytes added ,  10 months ago
m
Text replacement - "Discernment errors" to "Was William Branham's discernment ministry genuine?"
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Discernment errors" to "Was William Branham's discernment ministry genuine?")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|'''''I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.''''' - Friedrich Nietzsche
|'''''I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.''''' - Friedrich Nietzsche
|-
|-
|}
|}<br>
[[Image:Credibility.png|thumb|right|250px]]
In our search to find the truth and to separate fact from fiction as it relates to William Branham and his ministry, one of the the most important issues that has to be addressed is his credibility.  This need to be examined in relation to the various stories he tells in describing his supernatural experiences.
 
''To be persuasive, we must be believable; to be believable, we must be credible; to be credible, we must be truthful.'' — Edward R. Murrow
 
Credibility refers to the believability, trustworthiness and reliability of a person.
 
=Was William Branham credible?=
 
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; float:left; text-align:center; padding: 0.3em;margin-left:5px"
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; float:left; text-align:center; padding: 0.3em;margin-left:5px"
|'''''If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.''''' - Mark Twain
|'''''If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.''''' - Mark Twain
Line 21: Line 12:
|-
|-
|}
|}
In our search to find the truth and to separate fact from fiction as it relates to William Branham and his ministry, one of the the most important issues that has to be addressed is his credibility.  This need to be examined in relation to the various stories he tells in describing his supernatural experiences.
''To be persuasive, we must be believable; to be believable, we must be credible; to be credible, we must be truthful.'' — Edward R. Murrow
Credibility refers to the believability, trustworthiness and reliability of a person.


=Was William Branham credible?=
[[Image:Credibility.png|thumb|right|250px]]
Because William Branham was a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that he generally told the truth, that he was credible.  But that assumption must be discarded if it can be demonstrated that he regularly strayed from telling the truth.  
Because William Branham was a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that he generally told the truth, that he was credible.  But that assumption must be discarded if it can be demonstrated that he regularly strayed from telling the truth.  


Line 52: Line 50:
#[[An Uncertain Sound|Did William Branham claim to be a prophet?]]
#[[An Uncertain Sound|Did William Branham claim to be a prophet?]]
#[[The Nazarite Birth|Was William Branham born under a Nazarite Vow?]]
#[[The Nazarite Birth|Was William Branham born under a Nazarite Vow?]]
#[[Discernment errors|Was William Branham's discernment 100% accurate?]]
#[[Was William Branham's discernment ministry genuine?|Was William Branham's discernment 100% accurate?]]
#[[Guessing the disease|Was William Branham's ministry always 100%?]]
#[[Guessing the disease|Was William Branham's ministry always 100%?]]
#[[The Mystery of the Empty Cornerstone|What was in the cornerstone of Branham Tabernacle?]]
#[[The Mystery of the Empty Cornerstone|What was in the cornerstone of Branham Tabernacle?]]
Line 84: Line 82:
=But didn't Abraham lie?=
=But didn't Abraham lie?=


This should be considered as a response out of [[Cognitive Dissonance]] (if you don't know what this is, please click on the link).
We have had many message ministers deflect the issue of William Branham's credibility by pointing to the flaws of some of the prophets in the Old Testament.  Such a response is clearly coming out of [[Cognitive Dissonance]] (if you don't know what this is, please click on the link).


Many message believers, when confronted with the clear facts that William Branham lied repeatedly state, "Abramham lied and he was the father of faith." This is effectively admitting that William Branham lied but that it is not a big deal if he lied.
When a message believers, confronted with the clear facts that William Branham lied, states, "''Abramham lied and he was the father of faith,''" they are effectively admitting that William Branham lied but that it is not a big deal.


The problem with this argument is that it is a [[Failed Prophecies|red herring]].
The problem with this argument is that it is a [[Failed Prophecies|red herring]].
Line 94: Line 92:
William Branham, on the other hand, appeared to have lied to uphold the claim that God spoke to him and that his prophesies were authentic.  William Branham lied to make himself look like a prophet so that people would follow him.
William Branham, on the other hand, appeared to have lied to uphold the claim that God spoke to him and that his prophesies were authentic.  William Branham lied to make himself look like a prophet so that people would follow him.


Under the new covenant that we find in the New Testament, lying is not acceptable behaviour because the Bible plainly tells us what is expected of Christian leaders:
Under the new covenant as outlined in the New Testament, lying is not acceptable behaviour because the Bible plainly tells us what is expected of Christian leaders:


:''Therefore an overseer must be above reproach...<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 3:2–3.</ref>
:''Therefore an overseer must be above reproach...<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 3:2–3.</ref>