11,141
edits
An Open Letter to Owen Jorgensen: Difference between revisions
An Open Letter to Owen Jorgensen (view source)
Revision as of 22:02, 10 February 2014
, 10 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Mr. Jorgenson also inserts a couple of stray points [for example, that William Branham fulfilled various scriptures] which do not fit within the scope of his thesis, and which he doesn’t even attempt to support biblically or factually. For brevity and clarity, I will not be addressing those points. | Mr. Jorgenson also inserts a couple of stray points [for example, that William Branham fulfilled various scriptures] which do not fit within the scope of his thesis, and which he doesn’t even attempt to support biblically or factually. For brevity and clarity, I will not be addressing those points. | ||
==A scriptural basis?== | |||
Mr. Jorgenson’s presentation of “one very basic idea” seeks to establish a clear scriptural correlation between Nicodemus’ recognition of Jesus as a teacher sent from God and our recognition of William Branham as a teacher sent from God. | Mr. Jorgenson’s presentation of “one very basic idea” seeks to establish a clear scriptural correlation between Nicodemus’ recognition of Jesus as a teacher sent from God and our recognition of William Branham as a teacher sent from God. | ||
Before we explore the merits of this correlation, let's read the biblical passage that contains his thesis: | Before we explore the merits of this correlation, let's read the biblical passage that contains his thesis: | ||