A Scriptural Challenge to Followers of William Branham: Difference between revisions

A Scriptural Challenge to Followers of William Branham (view source)

Revision as of 00:13, 15 January 2016

168 bytes added , 8 years ago

→‎A Challenge to ALL Message Ministers and Message Believers

Admin

Bots, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, nuke, Suppressors, Administrators

11,141

edits

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 To date, '''there has been no adequate defense of the message''' with respect to any of the issues, concerns and problems raised by this website [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Independent research sources|and others]].
-We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message to all former message believers.  We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you.
+'''We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message''' to all former  and current message believers that have questions.  We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you.
-We would be happy to debate any message minister or message follower at such place and time that we could mutually agreed on.  Simply email us to get the ball rolling.
+Furthermore, we would be happy to debate any message minister or message follower at such place and time that we could mutually agreed on.  Simply email us to get the ball rolling.
-But any interaction must be done in a Biblical manner, with "gentleness and respect".
+But any interaction must be done in a Biblical manner - with "gentleness and respect".
 ==Failed attempts==
-We are aware of one message minister who tried to address [The Cloud|our issues with the Cloud]], but it was clear from his "defense" that he had never read our concerns.  How can we say this?  Because the issue
+We are aware of one message minister who tried to address [The Cloud|our issues with the Cloud]], but it was clear from his "defense" that he had never read our concerns.  How can we say this?  Because his "reasons" were issues that we had addressed clearly on our website.  Simply ignoring the questions raised is no defense.