11,153
edits
Are Christians required to tithe?: Difference between revisions
Are Christians required to tithe? (view source)
Revision as of 00:08, 15 November 2022
, 2 years ago→Summary
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|Proportional | |Proportional | ||
|Give as you have been prospered; according to your ability | |Give as you have been prospered; according to your ability | ||
|1 Cor 16:2 | |1 Cor 16:2 | ||
2 Cor 8:2–3 | 2 Cor 8:2–3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|Sacrificial, Generous | |Sacrificial, Generous | ||
|Give generously, even sacrificially, but not to the point of personal affliction | |Give generously, even sacrificially, but not to the point of personal affliction | ||
|2 Cor 8:2–3 | |2 Cor 8:2–3 | ||
Phil 4:17–18 | Phil 4:17–18 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|Intentional | |Intentional | ||
|Give deliberately in order to meet a genuine need, not out of guilt merely to soothe a pressing request | |Give deliberately in order to meet a genuine need, not out of guilt merely to soothe a pressing request | ||
|2 Cor 8:4 | |2 Cor 8:4 | ||
Phil 4:16 | Phil 4:16 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
for equality | for equality | ||
|Believers are to give so that all needs are met. | |Believers are to give so that all needs are met. | ||
| | |Actws 10:31 | ||
Rom 15:26 | |||
Gal 6:6 | 1 Cor 9:14–15 | ||
2 Cor 8:12–14 | |||
Gal 2:10Gal 6:6 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|5c | |5c | ||
| Line 71: | Line 74: | ||
|Voluntary | |Voluntary | ||
|Giving ought to be done out of one’s free will and not under compulsion | |Giving ought to be done out of one’s free will and not under compulsion | ||
|2 Cor 8:2–3, 8 | |2 Cor 8:2–3, 8 | ||
2 Cor 9:7 | 2 Cor 9:7 | ||
Phil 4:18 | Phil 4:18 | ||
| Line 105: | Line 108: | ||
===Tithing in the Rest of the New Testament=== | ===Tithing in the Rest of the New Testament=== | ||
Heb 7:1–3 demonstrate the greatness of Melchizedek.Hebrews 7:4–10 provides three specific reasons (or proofs) that Melchizedek’s priesthood was superior to the Levitical priesthood. First, Melchizedek is shown to be greater than Abraham on account of Abraham’s voluntary offering to him. The fact that Melchizedek received a tithe from Abraham is the central argument for Melchizedek’s superiority. Levi and Aaron were both ancestors of Abraham. When the author of Hebrews says that “even Levi … paid tithes,” the superiority of Melchizedek’s priesthood is proved. Therefore Melchizedek’s priesthood is superior to the Levitical one. | Heb 7:1–3 demonstrate the greatness of Melchizedek. Hebrews 7:4–10 provides three specific reasons (or proofs) that Melchizedek’s priesthood was superior to the Levitical priesthood. First, Melchizedek is shown to be greater than Abraham on account of Abraham’s voluntary offering to him. The fact that Melchizedek received a tithe from Abraham is the central argument for Melchizedek’s superiority. Levi and Aaron were both ancestors of Abraham. When the author of Hebrews says that “even Levi … paid tithes,” the superiority of Melchizedek’s priesthood is proved. Therefore Melchizedek’s priesthood is superior to the Levitical one. | ||
Those that use this passage to argue for tithing essentially concur with the above analysis regarding the primary meaning of Heb 7:1–10. However, they continue the analysis as follows - If Melchizedek is greater than the Levites and a type of Christ, then of whom is Abraham a picture? The answer supplied is “Christians.” However, this interpretation has several problems. First, if Abraham were a picture of Christians, his tithe was voluntary. It was offered as “a thanksgiving for victory.” This is not the picture of tithing during the Mosaic covenant, and neither is it the picture painted by many tithe supporters today. | Those that use this passage to argue for tithing essentially concur with the above analysis regarding the primary meaning of Heb 7:1–10. However, they continue the analysis as follows - If Melchizedek is greater than the Levites and a type of Christ, then of whom is Abraham a picture? The answer supplied is “Christians.” However, this interpretation has several problems. First, if Abraham were a picture of Christians, his tithe was voluntary. It was offered as “a thanksgiving for victory.” This is not the picture of tithing during the Mosaic covenant, and neither is it the picture painted by many tithe supporters today. | ||