11,153
edits
Long Hair or Uncut Hair: Difference between revisions
→The wording of 1 Corinthians 11
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
''Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head...<ref>The New International Version, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), 1 Co 11:4-5</ref> | ''Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head...<ref>The New International Version, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), 1 Co 11:4-5</ref> | ||
The New Testament was originally written in Greek, so we need to look at the original text to understand what is being said. Paul states that the man would shame his “head” if he were to have | The New Testament was originally written in Greek, so we need to look at the original text to understand what is being said. Paul states that the man would shame his “head” if he were to have ''“down the head”''; whereas the opposite would prevail for the woman: she would shame her “head” if she were to prophesy “uncovered as to the head.” <ref>Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1987), 495.</ref> | ||
The question, of course, is what | The question, of course, is what having “down the head” means, or to put that in another way, “having what down the head”? | ||
Some have argued that this refers to having long hair “down the head,” | Some have argued that this refers to having long hair “down the head,” because there is some indication in Greek literature that long hair on men was associated with homosexuality, where longer hair was artistically decorated to resemble a woman’s. The problem with this, however, is that these passages in Greek literature always refer to hair, and never remotely resemble the language Paul uses here. | ||
There three main pillars on which the “no trimming ” doctrine rests, at least as | If Paul had intended long hair, this idiom is a most unusual way of referring to it as he simply could have said "short hair" or " long hair." On the other hand, although Paul’s idiom is somewhat unusual, it is not without precedent. In Esther 6:12, Haman is said to have “hurried to his house, mourning and with his head covered”. The Septuagint translates this last phrase "kata kephalēs" (= “down the head”). | ||
So also Plutarch speaks of Scipio the Younger as beginning to walk through Alexandria “having the himation down the head,” meaning that he covered his head with part of his toga so as to be unrecognized by the people. Almost certainly, therefore, by this idiom Paul is referring to an external cloth covering.<ref>Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1987), 506–507.</ref> | |||
===Interpretation by message ministers=== | |||
There three main pillars on which the “no trimming ” doctrine rests, at least as message churches teach it, are as follows: | |||
1) The word “shorn” means “cut or clip – period”. | 1) The word “shorn” means “cut or clip – period”. | ||
2) The early church and true Christians have always taught “no trimming”. | 2) The early church and true Christians have always taught “no trimming”. | ||
3) | 3) William Branham believed in “no trimming”. | ||
Meaning of the Word “Shorn” in the Scriptures: | Meaning of the Word “Shorn” in the Scriptures: | ||