106
edits
Sandbox: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
With in-depth research, the evidence only points to one thing, the levitation of objects was a parlor trick nothing more. As the famous saying goes "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"<ref>https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes</ref> The evidence eliminates that William Branham actually saw a table floating. Two possibilities remain 1) William Branham was deceived by the medium into thinking the table was floating and then decided to play along with William Branham to have the table drop when he spoke the name | With in-depth research, the evidence only points to one thing, the levitation of objects was a parlor trick nothing more. As the famous saying goes "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"<ref>https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes</ref> The evidence eliminates that William Branham actually saw a table floating. Two possibilities remain 1) William Branham was deceived by the medium into thinking the table was floating and then decided to play along with William Branham to have the table drop when he spoke the name, Jesus Christ. This is highly unlikely since the medium would lose prestige. 2) William Branham lied and it never happen. One motive to tell this falsehood would be to gain prestige with the audience as an authority on the paranormal. This type of behavior has been see in other lies William Branham told. An example would be his false story about eagles<ref>http://believethesign.com/index.php?title=Stories_about_Eagles</ref> that can carry their young on their wings which he appeared to tell to gain prestige with his audience that he was an outdoorsman. | ||