William Branham and the nature of God: Difference between revisions

William Branham and the nature of God (view source)

898 bytes added , 4 years ago

no edit summary

11,154

edits

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 We do not spend time in this article highlighting the problems with William Branham's beliefs. That discussion is contained in other articles in this series, which can be accessed from the links at the top of the page and attempt to point out specific problem areas with William Branham's belief system. .  The purpose of this article is simply to highlight what he believed.
+=What did William Braham believe and teach?=
+William Branham initially believed in the doctrine of the Trinity.  However, he eventually came to believe that the doctrine of the Trinity was completely false.
+The problem is that if there is no Trinity, where does that leave Jesus? Here are the choices:
+#Jesus is a lower god. (Arianism)
+#Jesus is another god. (Tri-theism)
+#Jesus is not really the Son of God but is God the Father (Sabellianism or Oneness)
+#Jesus is just a man and was not deity. (Nestorianism)
+These points clearly answer the question, “If the Trinity is not true, then where does that leave Jesus?” It leaves Jesus as a false Jesus. This should establish why the Trinity is an essential of the faith and cannot be denied by anyone who calls themselves a Christian. It is good to point these out to someone who says the doctrine of the Trinity is not essential or primary.
 =William Branham's Continuously Changing View=