Supernatural photographs: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Below is a photograph that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire On The Rock Under Brother Branham and his son, Joseph".  The picture was supposedly taken at Sunset Mountain in Arizona on May 19, 1965.  however, it is more likely that the picture was taken at [[Rattlesnake Mesa]].  
Below is a photograph that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire On The Rock Under Brother Branham and his son, Joseph".  The picture was supposedly taken at Sunset Mountain in Arizona on May 19, 1965.  however, it is more likely that the picture was taken at [[Rattlesnake Mesa]].  


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.
If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.


<mediaplayer width='800' height='500'>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</mediaplayer>
<mediaplayer>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</mediaplayer>


This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites|Seek The Truth]]
This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites|Seek The Truth]]
Line 22: Line 22:
Here is the photo that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire Over Brother Branham's Shoulder".  It is a black & white photograph that was taken in March, 1964, at Soul's Harbor Temple in Dallas, Texas.  
Here is the photo that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire Over Brother Branham's Shoulder".  It is a black & white photograph that was taken in March, 1964, at Soul's Harbor Temple in Dallas, Texas.  


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder VoGR.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder VoGR.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


The problem is that '''the picture sold by Voice of God Recordings has been cropped'''.  The original of the photograph is displayed below:
The problem is that '''the picture sold by Voice of God Recordings has been cropped'''.  The original of the photograph is displayed below:


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.
Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.
Line 36: Line 36:
The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively.  These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.
The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively.  These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|250px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two  exposures to create a single image) photograph.  Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed.  This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.
It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two  exposures to create a single image) photograph.  Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed.  This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.
Line 42: Line 42:
Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light.  Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.
Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light.  Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|400px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|250px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg|right|]]
'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg|right|]]
Line 54: Line 54:
The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase.  The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950.  However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.
The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase.  The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950.  However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg|600px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature.  But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.
William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature.  But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.
Line 60: Line 60:
If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light.  Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera.  It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham.  Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting.  Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.
If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light.  Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera.  It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham.  Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting.  Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg|350px|top]]  [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg|400px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg|250px|top]]  [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg|250px|top]]</u></span></p>


For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].
For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].
Line 74: Line 74:
The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture.  Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant.  Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.
The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture.  Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant.  Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png|330px|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg|350px|top]] </u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png|250px|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg|250px|top]] </u></span></p>


'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash.  The light was not supernatural.
'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash.  The light was not supernatural.