11,154
edits
Credibility: Difference between revisions
→Was William Branham credible?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
As a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that William Branham was credible. But that assumption can be eliminated or overturned if it can be demonstrated that, at times, he did not tell the truth. This might not necessarily mean that he was lying, as it is possible to believe that what you are saying is the truth but it's really not. | As a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that William Branham was credible. But that assumption can be eliminated or overturned if it can be demonstrated that, at times, he did not tell the truth. This might not necessarily mean that he was lying, as it is possible to believe that what you are saying is the truth but it's really not. | ||
One significant issue is that [[Different Stories|William Branham's stories could change dramatically over time]]. Why did this happen? | |||
The following items have caused us to question William Branham's credibility (click on the links to read a detailed explanation of the issue): | The following items have caused us to question William Branham's credibility (click on the links to read a detailed explanation of the issue): | ||