11,153
edits
Supernatural photographs: Difference between revisions
→Houston photograph
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire. | William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire. | ||
If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light. Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera. It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham. Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting. Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph. | |||
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg|350px|top]] [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg|400px|top]]</u></span></p> | |||
For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]]. | |||
=Quotes of William Branham= | =Quotes of William Branham= | ||