11,154
edits
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ: Difference between revisions
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ (view source)
Revision as of 21:29, 12 October 2013
, 11 years ago→Branham's Followers carried this teaching to its logical conclusion
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''''The Spirit left Him, in the Garden of Gethsemane. He had to die, a man.''' Remember, friends, He didn't have to do that. That was God. God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh. And He didn't... If He'd a went up there, as God, He'd have never died that kind of death; can't kill God. But He didn't have to do it.<ref>IT.IS.THE.RISING.OF.THE.SUN_ JEFF.IN V-3 N-12 SUNDAY_ 65-0418M</ref> | '''''The Spirit left Him, in the Garden of Gethsemane. He had to die, a man.''' Remember, friends, He didn't have to do that. That was God. God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh. And He didn't... If He'd a went up there, as God, He'd have never died that kind of death; can't kill God. But He didn't have to do it.<ref>IT.IS.THE.RISING.OF.THE.SUN_ JEFF.IN V-3 N-12 SUNDAY_ 65-0418M</ref> | ||
=Branham's | =Branham's followers carried this teaching to its logical conclusion= | ||
''...'''the church has made the great mistake in making Jesus equal to God''' — which he is in a certain way — but '''he’s not God. He’s not Deity.''' I’m sorry, but he’s not, because God is not in him. No way. What God was in him is not Deity, same as what God is in you is not Deity, concerning Deity Himself, which is Sovereign God and Creator and Maintainer.<ref>Lee Vayle, Godhead: Tape #1500/11-05-2000, Godhead Q&A #4: Tangibility of God</ref> | ''...'''the church has made the great mistake in making Jesus equal to God''' — which he is in a certain way — but '''he’s not God. He’s not Deity.''' I’m sorry, but he’s not, because God is not in him. No way. What God was in him is not Deity, same as what God is in you is not Deity, concerning Deity Himself, which is Sovereign God and Creator and Maintainer.<ref>Lee Vayle, Godhead: Tape #1500/11-05-2000, Godhead Q&A #4: Tangibility of God</ref> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
'''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.</ref>Lee Vayle, The Supreme Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, July 1, 2000</ref> | '''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.</ref>Lee Vayle, The Supreme Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, July 1, 2000</ref> | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
<References/> | <References/> | ||