11,158
edits
Credibility: Difference between revisions
→Was William Branham credible
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
As a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that William Branham was credible. But that assumption can be eliminated or overturned if it can be demonstrated that, at times, he did not tell the truth. This might not necessarily mean that he was lying, as it is possible to believe that what you are saying is the truth but it's really not. | As a minister of the Gospel, one starts off with the assumption that William Branham was credible. But that assumption can be eliminated or overturned if it can be demonstrated that, at times, he did not tell the truth. This might not necessarily mean that he was lying, as it is possible to believe that what you are saying is the truth but it's really not. | ||
The following items have caused us to question William Branham's credibility: | The following items have caused us to question William Branham's credibility (click on the links to read a detailed explanation of the issue): | ||
*[[Roy Davis|When did William Branham embrace Pentecostalism?]] | *[[Roy Davis|When did William Branham embrace Pentecostalism?]] | ||