Humble Pie: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 116: Line 116:
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Problems With Prophecies</div>
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Problems With Prophecies</div>
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
|''Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail'' ~ I Corinthians 13:8a
|''Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail.'' ~ I Corinthians 13:8a
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 122: Line 122:
The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham.  Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy.  Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past.  The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies.  
The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham.  Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy.  Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past.  The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies.  


Click on headings if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue.  
'''Click on headings''' if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue.  


'''[[The Municipal Bridge Vision|Municipal Bridge]]'''
'''[[The Municipal Bridge Vision|Municipal Bridge]]'''
Line 130: Line 130:
'''[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'''
'''[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'''
:Part of William Branham’s 1933 prophecy was that FDR would pick on the Germans, lead the world to war, and run for four terms.  While Roosevelt was inaugurated four times, he did not pick on the Germans and followed the world to war after provocation by the Japanese. William Branham called Franklin D. Roosevelt a “rascal” in 1960, which indicates that he just did not like him.   
:Part of William Branham’s 1933 prophecy was that FDR would pick on the Germans, lead the world to war, and run for four terms.  While Roosevelt was inaugurated four times, he did not pick on the Germans and followed the world to war after provocation by the Japanese. William Branham called Franklin D. Roosevelt a “rascal” in 1960, which indicates that he just did not like him.   
'''[[1933 Ohio River Experience|The Voice on the Ohio River in 1933]]
:Many followers of William Branham's message point to the voice that was heard on the Ohio River as proof that William Branham was to forerun the second coming of Christ just as John the Baptist foreran Christ's first coming.  However, when closely examined there are a number of problems with this story, including the fact that the first accounts make no reference of a voice.  After a great deal of research, we are now of the view that William Branham's story of the baptismal service changed over time to include a voice when, in fact, no one that was there actually heard it.


'''[[Heavenly Vision]]'''
'''[[Heavenly Vision]]'''
Line 187: Line 190:
:This prophecy appears to be an interpretation of the wording in the book of Revelation, as opposed to a formal prophecy.  
:This prophecy appears to be an interpretation of the wording in the book of Revelation, as opposed to a formal prophecy.  


If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet.  Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, but they are appear to be “hit some, miss some” and not something you can trust.   
If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet.  While some of these prophecies may still come to pass, other have definitely missed the mark.  In the end his prophetic scorecard appears to be “you hit some, you miss some”, and not something you can trust.   


{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
Line 201: Line 204:
|}
|}


There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible.  However, opposing views can be supported from the Bible as well.  These teachings should not necessarily be dismissed simply because they are not Orthodox or traditionalAdditionally, Orthodox or traditional teachings should not be defended if they cannot be supported from the Bible.  
There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible.  However, opposing views may be capable of being supported from the Bible as well, and may even constitute the better view. 
 
Additionally, a number of William Branham's significant teachings appear to have been borrowed in large part from other menThe details of our finding on this issue can be found in our article on [[Plagiarism]].
 
The primary purpose of this website is to provide a balanced, unbiased information on the ministry of William BranhamWe therefore have a number of articles that discuss his doctrinal teachings.  We have not removed them, but over time will be augmenting them with comments relating to how they relate to a more orthodox position. Some of these teachings include:


'''[[Healing lines]]'''
'''[[Healing lines|Healing]]'''
:Jesus died for your salvation, and suffered for your healing.  Accepting his sacrifice results in spiritual and physical blessings that are confirmed by scriptures.   
:Jesus died for your salvation, and suffered for your healing.  Accepting his sacrifice results in spiritual and physical blessings that are confirmed by scriptures.   


Line 210: Line 217:


'''[[The Godhead]]'''
'''[[The Godhead]]'''
:The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false.  The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and Onesness beliefs – which is where William Braham described his doctrine.  Historically, this teaching is close (but not identical) to Swedenborg’s explanation of the Godhead that John Wesley ridiculed.  
:The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false.  The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and Onesness beliefs – which is how William Braham described his doctrine.  Historically, this teaching is closest (but not identical) to Swedenborg’s explanation of the Godhead that John Wesley ridiculed.  


'''[[The Serpent's Seed]]'''
'''[[The Serpent's Seed]]'''
:William Branham taught that Cain and Abel were twins, yet Adam was the father of Abel and the Serpent was the father of Cain.  While this doctrine can be supported by the scriptures (and others can refute it from the scriptures), it does not have any “salvation” componentThe good thing is that even if you could trace your lineage back to Cain, Jesus still died for your salvation.
:William Branham taught that Cain and Abel were twins, yet Adam was the father of Abel and the Serpent was the father of Cain.  While there appears to be some support in the scriptures for this doctrine, there are also a number of passages in the Bible that can be used to refute it.  Additionally, it is not salvational, i.e. accepting or rejecting this doctrine does not impact one's salvationHowever, even if one could trace their lineage back to Cain, Jesus still died for their sins.  
 
'''[[Alcohol]]'''
:William Branham preached against alcohol his whole life, and then was killed by a drunk driver.


'''[[Angel|Angels]]'''
'''[[Angel|Angels]]'''
Line 222: Line 226:


'''[[Seven Church Ages]], [[Seven Seals]], [[Mystery Babylon]]'''
'''[[Seven Church Ages]], [[Seven Seals]], [[Mystery Babylon]]'''
:These articles each present an interpretation of scripture as preached by William Branham in the 1960's.  I can no longer say with confidence that these doctrines were taught to him by an angel, although I can say with confidence that much of it comes directly from Clarence Larkin’s published dispensational teachings.   
:These articles each present an interpretation of scripture as preached by William Branham in the 1960's.  While William Branham indicated that these doctrines were taught to him by an angel, ti appears that much of it [[Plagiarism|comes directly from Clarence Larkin’s published dispensational teachings]].   


:Studying the church ages is a great way to learn Church history.  Some items you may learn while studying the Church Ages as taught by William Branham are:
:Studying the church ages is a great way to learn Church history.  Some items you may learn while studying the Church Ages as taught by William Branham are:
Line 230: Line 234:
:*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the Jeohvah Witnesses) was the first person to assign names to the Church Age Messengers (including himself as the Laodicean Messenger).  
:*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the Jeohvah Witnesses) was the first person to assign names to the Church Age Messengers (including himself as the Laodicean Messenger).  


These teachings remain on our site as we believe they present a reasonable interpretation of the Bible (though there are other reasonable interpretations as well). 
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to:
 
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (and that you won’t find on this site, hopefully), they include but are not limited to:
*God only deals with one prophet at a time,  
*God only deals with one prophet at a time,  
*Noah started building the ark after he saw Enoch go in a Rapture,   
*Noah started building the ark after he saw Enoch go in a Rapture,   
Line 244: Line 246:




<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Prophecy of his passing</div>
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">The Prophecy of William Branham's Death</div>
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
|''And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'' ~ Hebrews 12:27
|''And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'' ~ Hebrews 12:27
Line 250: Line 252:
|}
|}


In early 1964, a prophecy was communicated to William Branham that he would pass off the scene before the end of 1965 because of an error he would make.  We have researched [[Hagin Prophecy|this prophecy as detailed by Kenneth Hagin and Gordon Lindsay’s wife Freda]], and found it to be accurate enough to cause concern.   
Sometime in 1964 or 1965, a prophecy was communicated to William Branham that he would pass off the scene before the end of 1965 because of an error he would make.  We have researched [[Hagin Prophecy|this prophecy as detailed by Kenneth Hagin and Gordon Lindsay’s wife, Freda Lindsay]], and found that, according to Biblical principles, '''Kenneth Hagin accurately prophesied William Branham's death  in January 1964'''.  This should cause significant concern to anyone following William Branham's message.     
 
If you have evidence that you are willing to share that can answer any of the questions raised on this page, we would love to move any of these items from “serious problems” to “good evidence”, or update our summary of specific prophecies.     


{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;"
Line 302: Line 302:


Jeremy Bergen, Editor
Jeremy Bergen, Editor
Rod Bergen, Webmaster


www.believethesign.com
www.believethesign.com