Herbert Graef
Where was this testimony taken from? Shouldn't there be some kind of reference? - BroRod 17:25, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
- This testimony was written by Herbert himself, who has now died. I got it from Sis. Doris Kraus. Apparently this was someone they knew personally. Believethesign 18:10, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
- Should we make some kind of reference to where we got it (i.e. not to Sis. Kraus but generally when it was made). - BroRod 18:31, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
- The intro paragraph already states that he wrote this testimony himself in 2006 just before he died. Is this enough?
Main Page
Regarding how we should style the main page. I have typed this here as I don't know if you wanted to try to simulate this on the wiki site as I thought we were going to use the other page as a front. Anyways:
- We should give the reader significant direction on the main page,
- There should be few words on the main page,
- The main page should be simple and not cluttered
- There should be color, either by way of a central photo, or photos, or possibly a short flash presentation
I would take the content from the top box in the current proposed main page and have this as the only text on the page. If the flash presentation runs the 'Only Once' sequence, then the links should be worded to 'play' off this introduction. Each portal can then have the box style template.
For example: "Only once, in all history, has a supernatural being been photographed. There is a reason." should lead to "About the Photograph", "The reason for the Sign", "What does this mean to me" as central links. Two sub-set of links should direct the user as follows: Other Signs: "Healings", "Vindication", "Prophecies", "Restoration of Truth", Things you need to know: "Who is God, and what does He want", "Who was William Branham", "The Exodus" (use this as a link to an overview of the message around the world today), "Etc...")
These should all be 'eye catching' central topics. The links themselves may be controversial or invite a click, such as "Who is God". Things such as "eyewitness testimonies" will be highlighted links from the "Healings", "Vindication", and "Who was William Branham" portals as opposed to links on the main page, as that (to me) flows logically.
We should also use "Revelation" or "Restoration of Truth" instead of "Doctrines" as these words are way more interesting, and present a positive, rather than restrictive, image of the underlying subjects. Believethesign 22:35, 24 June 2006 (CDT)
- You didn't sign this. How am I supposed to know who this is from? ;^) BelieveTheSign tech staff 15:05, 21 June 2006 (CDT)
Greek words in English
There may be a style guideline decision to be made concerning the English transliterations of Greek words. According to some guidelines, Greek words are always capitalized, based on the fact that the original Greek text in UNCTIALS capitalized all letters. To capitalize them as quoted from the bible is actually a direct transliteration. However, in other trends, such as most interlinear Bibles, the texts is both lower case and upper case, converting to English standards. I think this is ok in most cases, but in some cases, it adds confusion for the researcher, since there are editorial decisions being made in deciding what and what not to capitalize. These turn into Bible interpretation decisions. For example, most Greek interlinear Bible's capitalize "Father, Son, and Holy Ghost" in Matt. 28:19, reflecting the interpreters bias that these are proper names. However, in the original greek there is no such capitalization. Once I realized this could happen, I made a decision to stay with the strict transliteration of Greek originals and keep all Caps. Something to think about. - Mark Aho
- I appreciate that the use of UNCIALS were common in early Greek manuscripts. However, my understanding is that this stylistic usage was not really common until the 3rd century AD and therefore is not necessarily indicative of the original text. -BroRod 08:20, 10 October 2006 (CDT)
Greek Redirect
I guess that is another way to do it. I guess I was thinking that eventually we'd have more details on the Greek page then just the language. Probably just a bit optimistic though (and it would be slightly out of scope of this project). Thanks! :D JordanCP 12:48, 23 November 2006 (CST)
Need For Monitors
This Page is about something that is very sacred to all "Believers". Respect for the simplicity of the "overall Message" ought to take precedent over individual(s) whose only aim maybe to get private interpretations across to the people.
Will believethesign.org be a "free for all" or will monitors (online deacons) be appointed to oversee what is placed on-line? It's frightening to think that just "anybody" can "add to" and/or "take away" from what is placed there. There are a lot of "fanatics in the extreme" out there just waiting for something like this. What measures or policies are in place to control these things? God bless you. Bro. Gerald.
- This is not like Wikipedia. We have changed the access security so that a person must get an account and password before they can make any changes to any of the articles. Currently there are only 2 people, my son and myself, that have the ability to issue accounts and passwords.
- We would never do this on an "open to everyone" basis.
- Additionally, we will be changing the default skin to people from the public so that they don't even see the login buttons or any of the editing menus on the left side of the page.
- One last thing is that I also have the ability to revoke someone editing privileges so that if somehow an extreme fanatic did start putting things on the site we could remove their ability to edit. BroRod 17:52, 7 December 2006 (CST)
- We also have the ability to revert back to a previous version of a page if something useful was deleted, tampered with, or vandalized. Jeremy Bergen 18:41, 7 December 2006 (CST)
- OR even if someone accidentally deletes something we can restore it useing the reversion function. BroRod 19:23, 7 December 2006 (CST)
- Bro's Rod and Jeremy - GREAT! That sets my mind at ease. I was just wondering what "checks and balances" were in place to protect against spiritual terrorists attacks. The guidelines you mentioned will certainly help prevent individuals from trying to sabatoge the simplicity and sincerity of the Message. Glush - Bro. Gerald
- Additionally, we will be changing the default skin to people from the public so that they don't even see the login buttons or any of the editing menus on the left side of the page.
- Thanks for mentioning this. I was wondering about it. Good to see it actually won't look like a wiki on the live site. :) JordanCP 17:58, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- I'm assuming also that we won't release articles on to the public side of the site until they are done? In other words when we go live it's not going to be site wide, but rather each finished article. Correct? And on live articles, will they still be able to be edited live? Or will they first be edited, approved and then updated? (I know this isn't a critical question but one that has had me curious.) :) JordanCP 18:16, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- When the site goes live, we simply remove the restriction on viewing the site to the general public. We can't do this on a page by page basis, however, we can ensure that pages that aren't public simply aren't linked from the main pages. Editors will still be able to edit on a live basis. Currently the public can't view or edit; when we go live we will remove the viewing restriction but leave the editing restriction so that you can't edit unles you have an ID and password. We will also change the default skin as indicated abouve. BroRod 18:31, 10 December 2006 (CST)
Broken links on page 2 of Invitation page.
Noticed just now on the Invitation page (page 2) ( http://www.believethesign.com/invitation.htm ) there are two broken links.
The BTS's first link is pointing to http://www.believethesign.com/www.believethesign.org (not sure if that is actually intentional) and the VGR link is going to
http://branham.org/MessageSearch/ which should actually be
http://www.branham.org/MessageSearch.htm
By the way, nice background info on you... didn't know you liked to pull good practical jokes! You seemed like such a serious person! What happened? ;) JordanCP 11:41, 12 January 2007 (CST)
- By the way, I left another correction on the BelieveTheSign_talk:Intro_website#The_First_Sign_-_Left_hand_vs._right_hand_-_text_correction_on_page page. Should have put this one there too. JordanCP 13:28, 12 January 2007 (CST)
Wiki site backups
I'm sure you have thought of this already, but... are off site backups being done of the wiki site (besides the hosting company's)? Either way, I'd be willing to help in this area on a weekly basis. I'd hate to see work get lost (data loss has always surprised me, in the strangest of situations). JordanCP 01:52, 17 January 2007 (CST)
Many thanks!
Thanks for the welcome. It is always a pleasure to do God's work whether big or small.
I wish everyone success.
God Bless, Sharol-Rose
Thanks!
Hi Bro Rod
Thanks for the Welcome!
Lord Bless TonyEdward 23:09, 19 January 2007 (CST)
Check your email
Bro. Rod I just sent you some files to upload for the extensions via your work email address. God bless. Bro. Wilson
- Got them and will play with them off line this weekend. Thanks very much, Bro. Robert. God bless! BroRod 08:13, 2 February 2007 (CST)
CARDS
Hi Bro Rod
Some brothers from my church went to the mens meeting and they recieved some of the cards printed for the website. They have been witnessing and using them, however they are now out of cards. I was wondering if you can send us some. I havent had a chance to do any work on here, been so busy with work and church, I should be available in a week or so.
Thanks & Lord Bless
Lord Bless TonyEdward
- He sends them to you?! I have to go to Cloverdale to get mine. ;) :) --JordanCP 10:08, 10 February 2007 (CST)
- We had 10,000 cards printed and I have only received 1 to date. They took a ton to the men's meeting and distributed them to those attending the meeting. What we are going to do is to put up a graphic file on a separate website so that people can download the grpahics and get the cards printed themselves, which is much more effective than shipping them all over the place. You should be able to get them printed for under $50 for a thousand cards. BroRod 12:53, 10 February 2007 (CST)
Card Image
Hi Bro Rod
Just checking on the site you mentioned that will have the graphic file to print the cards, the brothers from my church want to print the cards, if the site is not up yet, is it possible you can email me the graphic file, my email is tedward83@gmail.com. Thanks
Lord Bless TonyEdward 09:08, 7 March 2007 (CST)
- Bro. Tony. I think I can answer this for you. To get the graphic file, go to www.believethesign.org[1]. At the top of this page are three navigation links entitled 'Home', 'Links', and 'Witnessing Resources'. Click on the 'Witnessing Resources' link. This page starts to tell you about the card file. Click 'read more' at the bottom of the first paragraph. This will then give you the option to download a .pdf or a .eps file that you can send to a local print shop. Please let me know if you have any other questions. God Bless. Jeremy Bergen 09:30, 7 March 2007 (CST)
- Thanks Jeremy! Lord Bless TonyEdward 09:56, 7 March 2007 (CST)
New files for Extensions
Brother Rod,
I just sent you new files for you to upload to the wiki. I have also added examples & demos. I trust all is well. God Bless Bro. Wilson
updated files for the extensions
Bro. Rod,
I just sent you updated files to upload for the extensions. These should fix some bugs and also add the enhancements you suggested.
God Bless Bro. Robert
Bro. Rod - I sent the wrong files. I just sent you new ones in the zipped file. Bro. Robert
John Wesley
You just uploaded the sermon of John Wesley on Money. Most of his sermons are available on the internet, as well as his journal and notes on the bible. What do we want to make available through out website, and what do we want to link to external sources? Jeremy Bergen 14:47, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
- His sermon on money is very good. I think we should put a few of his better sermons on the site and then link to others. BroRod 22:29, 30 March 2007 (CDT)