Supernatural photographs: Difference between revisions

    From BelieveTheSign
    No edit summary
    Line 36: Line 36:
    <p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
    <p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>


    It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two  exposures to create a single image) photograph.  Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed.  This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.


    <p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
    Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light.  Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.


    <p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|400px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
    '''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.
    =Quotes of William Branham=




    {{Bottom of Page}}
    {{Bottom of Page}}

    Revision as of 05:53, 6 August 2014

    Click on headings to expand them, or links to go to specific articles.

    There are a number of photographs that William Branham and his followers point to as being supernatural vindication of his status of a prophet. But are these photographs really of a visible manifestation of God?

    Please examine these photographs and decide for yourselves.

    The Pillar of Fire with Joseph Branham

    Below is a photograph that is available for purchase from Voice of God Recordings entitled "Pillar Of Fire On The Rock Under Brother Branham and his son, Joseph". The picture was supposedly taken at Sunset Mountain in Arizona on May 19, 1965. however, it is more likely that the picture was taken at Rattlesnake Mesa.

    WMB and JB on rock.jpg

    If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.

    <mediaplayer width='800' height='500'>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</mediaplayer>

    This video was produced by Seek The Truth

    Pillar of Fire on his shoulder?

    Here is the photo that is available for purchase from Voice of God Recordings entitled "Pillar Of Fire Over Brother Branham's Shoulder". It is a black & white photograph that was taken in March, 1964, at Soul's Harbor Temple in Dallas, Texas.

    Pillar of fire shoulder VoGR.jpg

    The problem is that the picture sold by Voice of God Recordings has been cropped. The original of the photograph is displayed below:

    Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png

    Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.

    There is a light on his shoulder but it is sunlight. There is nothing supernatural about this photograph.

    The Fire of God?

    The following two photographs are available for purchase from Voice of God Recordings and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively. These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.

    WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg WMB preaching double exposure.jpg

    It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two exposures to create a single image) photograph. Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed. This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.

    Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light. Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.

    Multiple exposure 1.jpg Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg

    The conclusion: The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.

    Quotes of William Branham

    Footnotes


    Navigation