Matthew 17:11: Difference between revisions
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
'''ESV''' | '''ESV''' | ||
''He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist. <ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version, Mt 17:11–13 (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001). </ref> | :''He answered, “Elijah does come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man will certainly suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist. <ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version, Mt 17:11–13 (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001). </ref> | ||
'''NET''' | '''NET''' | ||
''He answered, “Elijah does indeed come first and will restore all things. And I tell you that Elijah has already come. Yet they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they wanted. In the same way, the Son of Man will suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist.<ref>Biblical Studies Press, The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible, Mt 17:11–13 (Biblical Studies Press, 2006).</ref> | :''He answered, “Elijah does indeed come first and will restore all things. And I tell you that Elijah has already come. Yet they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they wanted. In the same way, the Son of Man will suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist.<ref>Biblical Studies Press, The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible, Mt 17:11–13 (Biblical Studies Press, 2006).</ref> | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 15 June 2013
William Branham pointed to Matthew 17:11 as proof that there was to be a Gentile Elijah:
Is this a proper interpretation of this scripture?While William Branham's interpretation does appear to make sense, is it correct? ScriptureKJV
ESV
NET
References
|