BelieveTheSign

The Municipal Bridge Vision: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Top of Page}}
{{Top of Page}}
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
=Municipal Bridge Infographic=
[[File:Municipal Bridge Infographic.png|left]]
<div>Feel free to download and distribute this simple infographic</div>
=Municipal Bridge video=
=Municipal Bridge video=


Line 11: Line 14:
|-
|-
|}
|}
[[Image:Tab30.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge as seen from Jeffersonville, with Louisville, Kentucky in the background]]
[[Image:Tab30.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge as seen from Jeffersonville, with Louisville, Kentucky in the background]]


 
=The Municipal Bridge Vision - did it fail?=


William Branham told a story that, if true, would be genuinely remarkable. As a young child, he claimed to have had a vision of a bridge spanning the Ohio River — and sixteen men falling to their deaths during its construction. Twenty-two years later, he said, the Louisville Municipal Bridge was built, and sixteen men died just as he'd seen.
William Branham told a story that, if true, would be genuinely remarkable. As a young child, he claimed to have had a vision of a bridge spanning the Ohio River — and sixteen men falling to their deaths during its construction. Twenty-two years later, he said, the Louisville Municipal Bridge was built, and sixteen men died just as he'd seen.


That's the story. Now let's look at what actually happened.
That's the story. Now let's look at what actually happened.
----


== The Vision, In His Own Words ==
== The Vision, In His Own Words ==
Line 26: Line 27:
It wasn't fulfilled. Here's why.
It wasn't fulfilled. Here's why.
----
----
 
{| style="width:200px; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; float:right; text-align:center; padding: 0.3em;margin-left:15px"
|'''[http://en.believethesign.com/index.php/French#La_v.C3.A9rit.C3.A9_pure_et_simple_sur_la_proph.C3.A9tie_du_pont En Francais]'''  <br> La vérité pure et simple sur la prophétie du pont.
----------------
'''[http://en.believethesign.com/index.php/Dutch#William_Branham.27s_visioen_van_Municipalbrug_in_Louisville Dutch]''' <br> William Branham's visioen van Municipalbrug in Louisville.
|-
|}
== Problem #1: The Deaths Simply Didn't Happen ==
== Problem #1: The Deaths Simply Didn't Happen ==
Two men died building the Louisville Municipal Bridge. Two.
Two men died building the Louisville Municipal Bridge. Two.
Line 35: Line 41:
That's it. That's the entire death toll.
That's it. That's the entire death toll.


You might wonder: could records have been lost? Could sixteen deaths have gone unreported? It's a fair question — and researchers at ''Searching for Vindication'' actually went and checked. They traveled to the National Archives in Atlanta and photographed every page of the daily logs kept by Life Saving Station #10, the Coast Guard station located less than half a mile from the bridge. These logs documented every rescue and recovery operation on that stretch of river from 1881 to 1972. The researchers went through every entry from May 1928 through December 1939 — a full decade past the bridge's completion.
You might wonder: could records have been lost? Could sixteen deaths have gone unreported? It's a fair question — and researchers at [[Searching for Vindication]] actually went and checked. They traveled to the National Archives in Atlanta and photographed every page of the daily logs kept by Life Saving Station #10, the Coast Guard station located less than half a mile from the bridge. These logs documented every rescue and recovery operation on that stretch of river from 1881 to 1972. The researchers went through every entry from May 1928 through December 1939 — a full decade past the bridge's completion.


Nothing. No mass drowning. No construction catastrophe involving sixteen men. Not even close.
Nothing. No mass drowning. No construction catastrophe involving sixteen men. Not even close.
Line 57: Line 63:


== The Newspaper Deception ==
== The Newspaper Deception ==
[[Image:Masthead_North_Carolinian_1890_01_22.png|thumb|500px|right]]
[[Image:Pg_4_North_Carolinian_1890_01_22.png|thumb|250px|right]]
A January 22, 1890 article from the ''North Carolinian'' — headlined "Sixteen Men Killed" — reports on the caisson accident at the Big Four Bridge. Some Message followers started circulating this article on social media, claiming it was from the late 1920s and proved Branham's prophecy was fulfilled at the Municipal Bridge.
A January 22, 1890 article from the ''North Carolinian'' — headlined "Sixteen Men Killed" — reports on the caisson accident at the Big Four Bridge. Some Message followers started circulating this article on social media, claiming it was from the late 1920s and proved Branham's prophecy was fulfilled at the Municipal Bridge.


Line 79: Line 87:


== Problem #4: He Pointed to a Specific Section of the Bridge That "Fell" ==
== Problem #4: He Pointed to a Specific Section of the Bridge That "Fell" ==
This detail comes from Pearry Green, a prominent Message minister. According to Green, Branham didn't just vaguely refer to the Municipal Bridge — he stood underneath it and physically pointed out the ''exact section'' that he claimed had fallen into the river, killing the sixteen men.
This detail comes from Pearry Green, a prominent Message minister. [https://youtu.be/Qdq98yB_KH0?si=F41TUeqODJFHQaD- According to Green], Branham didn't just vaguely refer to the Municipal Bridge — he stood underneath it and physically pointed out the ''exact section'' that he claimed had fallen into the river, killing the sixteen men.


No section of the Municipal Bridge has ever fallen into the Ohio River. This isn't a gaps-in-the-record situation — a partial bridge collapse into a major navigable river would have been front-page news across the region. It didn't happen.
No section of the Municipal Bridge has ever fallen into the Ohio River. This isn't a gaps-in-the-record situation — a partial bridge collapse into a major navigable river would have been front-page news across the region. It didn't happen.
Line 109: Line 117:


== The Excuses (And Why They Don't Hold Up) ==
== The Excuses (And Why They Don't Hold Up) ==
[[Image:The Bridge Prophecy explained.jpg|thumb|250px|right]]
Over the years, Message followers have floated several alternative explanations. Here's why each one fails.
Over the years, Message followers have floated several alternative explanations. Here's why each one fails.


Line 117: Line 126:
'''"He was young and misremembered"''' — As an adult, he said the vision was fulfilled. He claimed his mother wrote it down at the time. At what point does "he was young" stop being an explanation and start being a cover story?
'''"He was young and misremembered"''' — As an adult, he said the vision was fulfilled. He claimed his mother wrote it down at the time. At what point does "he was young" stop being an explanation and start being a cover story?


'''"The 1937 flood destroyed the records"''' — The Coast Guard log books survive. Complete archived copies of the Jeffersonville newspapers survive. This excuse is simply false, and the research done by Searching for Vindication documents it thoroughly.
'''"The 1937 flood destroyed the records"''' — The Coast Guard log books survive. Complete archived copies of the Jeffersonville newspapers survive. This excuse is simply false, and the research done by [[Searching for Vindication]] documents it thoroughly.


'''"It was actually about the Sydney Harbour Bridge"''' — Branham specifically named the Municipal Bridge in the earliest recorded retelling, in 1948. Of the 16 deaths during Sydney's construction, only 2 involved falling from the bridge — Branham said he saw 16 people fall. The Sydney Harbour Bridge also spans an ocean inlet, not a river. And it opened in 1932, which puts Branham's vision around 1910 if you subtract twenty-two years — when he was barely one year old. None of this works.
'''"It was actually about the Sydney Harbour Bridge"''' — Branham specifically named the Municipal Bridge in the earliest recorded retelling, in 1948. Of the 16 deaths during Sydney's construction, only 2 involved falling from the bridge — Branham said he saw 16 people fall. The Sydney Harbour Bridge also spans an ocean inlet, not a river. And it opened in 1932, which puts Branham's vision around 1910 if you subtract twenty-two years — when he was barely one year old. None of this works.
Line 124: Line 133:
----
----


== The Bottom Line ==
= The Bottom Line =
Branham was in Arizona when the Municipal Bridge was built. He returned to Jeffersonville after his brother died in June 1929, right as the bridge was nearing completion. He grew up in a town with living memory of the Big Four Bridge disaster upstream. He didn't tell this story in Jeffersonville — of all places — until 1960, by which point checking the facts would have taken real effort and real time, from people who trusted him completely.
Branham was in Arizona when the Municipal Bridge was built. He returned to Jeffersonville after his brother died in June 1929, right as the bridge was nearing completion. He grew up in a town with living memory of the Big Four Bridge disaster upstream. He didn't tell this story in Jeffersonville — of all places — until 1960, by which point checking the facts would have taken real effort and real time, from people who trusted him completely.


Line 132: Line 141:


If this prophecy was false — whether fabricated or genuinely confused and then misrepresented as fulfilled — the question that follows isn't a comfortable one: what else was?
If this prophecy was false — whether fabricated or genuinely confused and then misrepresented as fulfilled — the question that follows isn't a comfortable one: what else was?
----''For more detailed primary source research on this topic, the Searching for Vindication website documents the archival work referenced throughout this article.''
----''For more detailed primary source research on this topic, the [[Searching for Vindication]] website documents the archival work referenced throughout this article.''
 
 


=Background information=


 
==About the Louisville Municipal Bridge==
 
 
 
 
William Branham often told of a vision he had as a young child of 16 men falling to their deaths while building a bridge across the Ohio river.
 
=Prophecy=
''I was playing marbles out with my little brothers, out in the front yard. And all at once I had a strange feeling come on me. And I stopped and set down aside of a tree. And we were right up on the bank from the Ohio River. And I looked down towards Jeffersonville, and I seen a bridge rise up and go across that, the river, span the river. And I seen '''sixteen men''' (I counted them) that '''dropped off''' of there and '''lost their lives on that bridge'''. I run in real quick and told my mother, and she thought I went to sleep. But they kept it in mind, and '''twenty-two years from then''' the Municipal Bridge now (that many of you cross when you cross there) crossed the river at the same place, and '''sixteen men lost their life building that bridge across the river.''' It's never failed to be perfectly true.''  (My Life Story, Los Angeles, April 19, 1959)
 
=About the Louisville Municipal Bridge=
Originally called the '''Louisville Municipal Bridge''', the '''George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge''' is a four-lane cantilever bridge crossing the Ohio River between Louisville, Kentucky and Jeffersonville, Indiana, carrying US 31.  The bridge was designed by Ralph Modjeski and Frank Masters, consulting engineers.  The contract for construction of the substructure was signed June 1, 1928 with the Vang Construction Company of Pittsburgh, the low bidder, and construction began soon thereafter.  The contract for the construction of the superstructure was signed July 5, 1928 with the American Bridge Company of New York, the low bidders for this portion of the work.  The contract specified a penalty if the this portion of the work was not completed by December 1, 1929.
Originally called the '''Louisville Municipal Bridge''', the '''George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge''' is a four-lane cantilever bridge crossing the Ohio River between Louisville, Kentucky and Jeffersonville, Indiana, carrying US 31.  The bridge was designed by Ralph Modjeski and Frank Masters, consulting engineers.  The contract for construction of the substructure was signed June 1, 1928 with the Vang Construction Company of Pittsburgh, the low bidder, and construction began soon thereafter.  The contract for the construction of the superstructure was signed July 5, 1928 with the American Bridge Company of New York, the low bidders for this portion of the work.  The contract specified a penalty if the this portion of the work was not completed by December 1, 1929.


Line 153: Line 151:


It was during this time that William Branham was working as a cowhand in Arizona.  He returned to Jeffersonville after he received news that his brother Edward had passed away on June 20, 1929.  When he returned to Jeffersonville, the new bridge would have been opened or very close to completion. In 1949, the bridge was renamed in honor of George Rogers Clark. The bridge was rehabilitated in 1958, and is still in use today.
It was during this time that William Branham was working as a cowhand in Arizona.  He returned to Jeffersonville after he received news that his brother Edward had passed away on June 20, 1929.  When he returned to Jeffersonville, the new bridge would have been opened or very close to completion. In 1949, the bridge was renamed in honor of George Rogers Clark. The bridge was rehabilitated in 1958, and is still in use today.
=Problems with the Prophecy=
{| style="width:200px; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; float:right; text-align:center; padding: 0.3em;margin-left:15px"
|'''[http://en.believethesign.com/index.php/French#La_v.C3.A9rit.C3.A9_pure_et_simple_sur_la_proph.C3.A9tie_du_pont En Francais]'''  <br> La vérité pure et simple sur la prophétie du pont.
----------------
'''[http://en.believethesign.com/index.php/Dutch#William_Branham.27s_visioen_van_Municipalbrug_in_Louisville Dutch]''' <br> William Branham's visioen van Municipalbrug in Louisville.
|-
|}
==Problem 1: No evidence of 16 fatalities==
There are no historic documents or evidence supporting the statement that 16 men died during the construction of the Louisville Municipal Bridge.  '''In a telephone conversation between the editor of this website and George Smith, William Branham's son-in-law, George Smith admitted that this vision was not fulfilled.'''
Additionally, it is clear that William Branham stated that the 16 men died by drowning:
:''Here at the municipal bridge. Sister, no doubt you know where the municipal bridge is, don't you, cross from Jeffersonville to Louisville?''
:''Twenty-two years, when I was a little boy, just a little bitty lad about five years old, or six years old, when the Angel of the Lord appeared in the bush... You've heard me tell that haven't you, when I was packing water?''
:''Well, about two weeks after that, I was playing marbles with my little brother. And I thought I'd got sick, some real funny feeling came on me. And I went and set down by the side of a tree. And I looked down at the river, and there went a bridge, a big, great big bridge going across the river. '''And I counted sixteen men that fell off of that bridge and drowned.''' And I went and told mother. And I told her I seen it. And they thought I was crazy or something. They thought I was just at a little nervous hysterical child.''
:''And twenty-two years from that time, on the same ground went the municipal bridge across, and sixteen men lost their lives on it. See? Wasn't nothing that... It's--it's God sent it. Your prayers brought it. See?''<ref>William Branham, EXPERIENCES, Phoenix, AZ, 48-0302</ref>
Based on research done by [[Searching for Vindication]], there were only 2 fatalities in the construction of the bridge:
*On Wednesday, June 19, 1929, Richard Pilton died after being hit in the temple with an iron crank.  He did not drown.
*On September 10, 1929. Lloyd McEwen lost his footing and fell, landing on a barge below the bridge. He did not drown, but rather died from the injuries caused by his fall.
Additionally,  Life Saving Station #10 on the river at Louisville, KY was in service from 1881 until 1972.  This station was located near the falls of the Ohio River because it was considered the most dangerous section of the river. The station was manned around the clock and operated as a bonafide Coast Guard Station. Over the years, there were three different vessels that served as the Life Saving Station. The last vessel was put into service in 1929.
Life Saving Station #10 maintained dailiy logs containing the daily records of the station, including records of every rescue and recovery operation that the Coast Guard participated in from 1881 until 1972. The station was located less than a half-mile from the municipal bridge, the Coast Guard would be the first responders to any event on the bridge where someone fell into the river. The people at Searching for Vindication traveled to the offices of the National Archives and Records Administration in Atlanta to examine the logs. They photographed every page of the log books from from May 1, 1928 through December 31, 1939 to determine whether there was a significant drowning event related to the bridge.  They extended it to 10 years after the completion of the bridge to ensure that they would find any incidents that happened during the construction of the bridge or in any of the maintenance of the municipal bridge in the 10 years after the bridge was completed. 
There were no events from the logs that included anyone drowning related to the construction or maintenance of the bridge from 1928 to 1939.
The research documented on the Searching for Vindication website refutes any claim that the records in 1929 were inaccurate, and that the 16 fatalities were simply not recorded. 


We would highly recommend those interested in this issue to read the research performed by [[Searching for Vindication]].
We would highly recommend those interested in this issue to read the research performed by [[Searching for Vindication]].


==Problem 2: Similar fatalities on another bridge==
==Newspaper article - The Big Four Bridge==
[[Image:Masthead_North_Carolinian_1890_01_22.png|thumb|500px|right]]
[[Image:Pg_4_North_Carolinian_1890_01_22.png|thumb|250px|right]]
Our research indicates that many deaths occurred during the construction of the Big Four Bridge, which is a railroad bridge a half-mile upstream from the Municipal Bridge that opened to the public in 1895. 
 
Construction of the Big Four bridge began on October 10, 1888.  A summary of the fatalities during the construction is as follows:
 
#12 people died working on a pier foundation when a caisson flooded (about a year after construction started);
#4 people died when a wooden beam broke in a different pier caisson (several months after the first accident); and
#On December 15, 1893, a construction crane was dislodged by wind causing the supporting truss to collapse which resulted 41 workers falling into the Ohio river.  21 workers died as a result.<ref>Kleber, John E. (2000). Encyclopedia of Louisville. University Press of Kentucky. p. 89. ISBN 0-8131-2100-0. Retrieved April 8, 2014.</ref>
 
In William Branham's vision, 16 people died when they fell off the bridge.  With the Big Four Bridge, 37 people died in the construction of the bridge.  All of these fatalities occurred before William Branham was born.
 
Was this the reason that William Branham did not tell the story in his home town, Jeffersonville, until 1960?  Did he simply make up the story knowing that no one would be able to check the facts?  People would have remembered a lot of people being killed in the construction of a bridge many years in the past but would have been unable to differentiate between the Big Four bridge and the Municipal Bridge.
 
===Deception by message followers===
 
An article from page 4 of the North Carolinian newspaper on January 22, 1890, is contained on the right-hand side of this page.  The article is entitled "Sixteen Men Killed" and tells the story of 16 men who fell to their death in the construction of the Big Four bridge in Louisville, Kentucky in 1890.  It incorrectly reports a death toll of 16 people when other newspaper reports listed only 12 men as dying in the accident (4 men died several months later).
 
This article has been the subject of deceptive social media posts by a few message followers who state incorrectly that the article is from the late 1920's and specifically relates to the construction of the Municipal Bridge.  This was done as proof that the municipal bridge vision was fulfilled.  Sadly, this is a lie promoted by some in the message who have no regard for the truth.


The text of the January 22, 1890 newspaper report is as follows:
The text of the January 22, 1890 newspaper report is as follows:
Line 228: Line 176:
:''The most plausible theory as to the cause of the accident is thus given by one of the survivors, Louis Crouch, and his story receives not a little credence from the Superintendent of the work.  Knox, the foreman, had been seen near the key which controls the air supply, and it is believed that he cut off the air more than he really intended to, causing the caisson to sink into the sand.''
:''The most plausible theory as to the cause of the accident is thus given by one of the survivors, Louis Crouch, and his story receives not a little credence from the Superintendent of the work.  Knox, the foreman, had been seen near the key which controls the air supply, and it is believed that he cut off the air more than he really intended to, causing the caisson to sink into the sand.''


==Problem 3: The timing of the vision==
==Video Script==
 
The Louisville Municipal Bridge opened on October 31, 1929.  William Branham said that he had the vision twenty-two years prior to the accident.  This places the vision in 1907, which is before he was born.  However, William Branham also said he had this prophecy when he was either five or six years old (approx. 1914) while playing marbles with his brother.  The only things that happened in 1936, which is twenty-two years from 1914, was that the toll on the Louisvill Municipal Bridge changed from 35 cents to 25 cents and the ''Louisville'', a lifeboat anchored near the Municipal Bridge, was relocated downstream.  As a result, the fulfillment of this prophecy has nothing to do with twenty-two years from the date of the vision.
 
==Problem 4: William Branham's Reference was to the Municipal Bridge==
In a phone conversation with Pearry Green, he told us that William Branham stood underneath the Municipal bridge, and pointed out the exact section of the bridge that fell into the river.  That is the reason that Pearry specifically points out on the video clip the exact section of the bridge that he said fell into the river and which resulted in the deaths of 16 men.
 
The problem is not in Pearry Green's retelling of the story - he did not grow up in Jeffersonville and had no reason to doubt William Branham.  The problem lies with William Branham's prophecy and the story that he used to prove its fulfillment.  There is no historic indication that any section or portion of the Municipal Bridge fell into the Ohio river or that anyone died in its construction, other than the two men whose deaths were reported in the newspapers.
 
==Problem 5: William Branham refers to the Municipal Bridge as being unimportant==
 
One would think that William Branham would have been very interested in the municipal bridge because of his vision, but he appears not to have been:
 
:''That's the way a person that's been redeemed and understands it, you get emotionally. You can't help it when you're... The story was told that he could have--he could live because the perfect lamb died in his place, the little fellow could rejoice, under a... That's the way I felt the day that the story come to my heart. I... Knowing that I was a sinner, I couldn't even find a church that made an altar call. I went from one to the other. No one made an altar call; no one invited. '''They was all talking about flowers, and the new bridge that went across the river. And I--I wasn't interested in that. You read that in newspaper.''' I wanted to hear the Bible, the Word.''  55-1119 REDEEMER.REDEMPTION_ SAN.FERNANDO.CA
 
==Problem 6: Why did William Branham not tell the story in Jeffersonville until 1960?==
 
We received the following question on our [http://www.facebook.com/BelieveTheSign discussion page] - "''If what the telling of the bridge is true, that there were not 16 victims, how about the local people living in that time? They must have known about the bridge, and why would Bro. Branham tell such story to the local people? They would know if he had made it up, he would be a bad liar''".
 
Take a look at the quotes below.  Is it just a bit curious that the first time he related the story in Jeffersonville was in 1960, over 30 years after the fact?
 
30 years after the fact people may remember that there was a big accident on a bridge where a bunch of people died.  But 30 years after the fact, they won't remember when it happened or even how many people died.
 
But these people in Branham Tabernacle trusted William Branham.  If they did have a bit of a question, would they easily be able to go back and look?  Remember this was prior to Google.  It would have been a fair amount of work, even if they had a bit of doubt, so they would have given William Branham the benefit of the doubt, because they trusted him implicitly.
 
Please see the reference to the Big Four Bridge above. It is an interesting coincidence that 15+ years before William Branham was born, there was an accident in which a number of people were killed in a bridge accident one half mile upstream from the municipal bridge.  It is likely that any locals might have thought he made a simple mistake and was referring to the wrong bridge.
 
Also, the municipal bridge was renamed in 1949 to the George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge.  The local simply call it the Second Street Bridge.  If you look at the "Generation" book by Angel Smith, you will notice that it doesn't appear that any one in that book lived in Jeffersonville in 1929.  Those in the book that were locals (very few) were born after 1930 or would have been small children at the time.  Also, it appears that a lot of the people in Branham Tabernacle had moved into the area to specifically be close to WMB and so would not have resided in Jeffersonville in 1929.
 
So in 1960, 30 years after the fact, William Branham told the story and no one noticed.  As that was the first time on record that he told it in Jeffersonville, it is really not surprising that no one would have questioned him on it.
 
==Problem 7: Why didn't William Branham warn anyone?==
 
If William Branham knew that people were going to die in the construction of the bridge, why didn't he attempt to warn anyone?
 
Put yourself in William Branham's shoes.  What would you have done if you had a vision of 16 men dying in a construction accident on a bridge that they then started building years later.  Wouldn't you have warned everyone?
 
This vision is suspect simply because William Branham never attempted to warn anyone.  In fact, he seemed quite proud of the fact that he foretold their deaths (which in fact never happened).
 
=Excuses for the failed vision=
[[Image:The Bridge Prophecy explained.jpg|thumb|250px|right]]
 
Are you looking for a simple and easy way to ignore the facts above?  If so, this is called [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]].  It is a term that explains why intelligent people will often settle for answers that are not reasonable, in order to ignore the real issue.
 
==The failed interpretation theory==
 
The followers of Junior Jackson, who are on the fringes of the message in that they reject some of William Branham's plain teaching, have a theory that William Branham simply misinterpreted the municipal bridge vision.  However, this theory has several problems:
 
===A lack of biblical precedence===
 
As proof for this theory, the Jr. Jackson followers quote a portion of Acts 10:17 which reads:
 
:''Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean...<ref>The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), Ac 10:17.</ref>
 
But they fail to address the fact that it quickly became very clear to Peter what the vision meant.  In fact, all that one has to do is to read Acts chapters 10 and 11 to understand the meaning of the vision.
 
As a result, we can conclude that the use of Acts 10:17 to justify William Branham's failed vision is in itself an act of deception.
 
===William Branham lied about the interpretation===
 
As indicated above, William Branham stood underneath the Municipal bridge, and indicated to Pearry Green the exact section of the bridge that fell into the river. But this was a lie!
 
William Branham's prophecy and the story that he used to prove its fulfillment are both false. The was not simply an incorrect interpretation.  The story of fulfillment that William Branham told was false.
 
==The "suicide" theory==
 
This theory holds that William Branham did not have the correct interpretation of the municipal bridge vision:
 
#William Branham was living in Arizona during the construction of the bridge and so was not aware that there were only 2 fatalities in the construction of the bridge.
#He was also confused by stories relating to the construction of the Big Four Bridge in which a number of people did die.
#Based on these bad facts, he incorrectly interpreted the vision.
#The correct interpretation of the vision is found in the fact that many people have died committing suicide by jumping from the bridge.
 
The problem with this "interpretation" of the vision is that it ignores some of the details that William Branham provided with respect to the vision:
 
:''...Sixteen men dropped off in—into the water and perished. And '''I seen a big sign, it said “twenty-two years.”''' I run in and told my mother. Oh, she said, “Son, you’re nervous. You went to sleep and you were dreaming.” I said, “No. No. I saw it.” So they wrote it down on a piece of paper. And twenty-two years from then, the great bridge crossed the river, and twen—sixteen men dropped off of it and—and drowned in the river. Every time, it’s perfect.<ref>55-0626A - My Life Story</ref>
 
William Branham saw a big sign that said "twenty-two years." 
 
As a result, we must conclude that this flawed attempt to "correctly" interpret the vision also fails to answer the fundamental problems with any proposed theory for the fulfillment of the vision.
 
==William Branham was young when he had the vision==
 
If William Branham was young when he had the vision, perhaps he simply forgot it or misremembered it.  Kids forget a lot of things and get memories messed up.  That would explain why the vision was not fulfilled properly.
 
If this is the case, then it could still be fulfilled in the future, when the bridge is being repaired
 
There are several problems with this explanation:
 
1. Why would God give a vision to a child but not give him the ability to remember it?
 
2. William Branham said that the people that heard him give the vision wrote it down.
 
3. William Branham said, '''as an adult''', that the vision was fulfilled.  The problem is that he is attesting to something that was not true.  '''Why did he say that 16 men died on the bridge, when they didn't?'''
 
==The 1937 Flood destroyed all of the historical archives==
 
This was the position of Voice of God Recordings until a blog called [[Searching for Vindication]] destroyed this as a plausible theory.  While it is true that some archives were damaged, complete archived copies of the Jeffersonville Newspapers and the Coast Guard log books remain preserved.
 
Also, does anyone actually believe that the wives, children and parents of the families of 16 men who died would allow their memories to be forgotten?  Not in America.
 
==The vision properly relates to the Ohio River Flood of 1937==
 
This excuse basically says that only one small element of the vision was true - that the vision was fulfilled 22 years after he saw it.  But this would mean that virtually everything else about the vision was false.
 
==The vision properly relates to the Sydney Harbour Bridge in Australia==
 
This explanation is only possible if you go beyond the realms of reasonableness ([[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]] again).
 
The rationale for the Sydney Harbour bridge being the actual object of the prophecy is as follows:
 
#16 people were killed in the construction of the bridge.
#The bridge was opened in March 1932 and if you roll back 22 years, that takes you to about the time that William Branham was born.
#William Branham never mentioned the Municipal Bridge in the original vision.
 
Proponents of this wild theory don't consider the following:
 
#In the FIRST recorded retelling of the vision in 1948 (48-0302), William Branham specifically refers to the municipal bridge.
#While 16 people did die in the construction of the Sydney Harbour bridge, only 2 of these people died from falling off the bridge.  William Branham clearly stated that he saw 16 people fall from the bridge.
#William Branham stated that he had the vision when he was 5 or 6 years old, so 22 years later would put the Sydney Bridge deaths much too early in time.
#William Branham clearly stated that he saw the bridge spanning the river but the Sydney Harbour bridge goes across a narrow part of an inlet (i.e. its over the ocean, not a river).
 
==The men drowned in concrete==
John "Jack" Vissing, the son of the late Richard Vissing, a former mayor of Jeffersonville, stated that:
 
:''My father was 14 when the bridge opened in 1929, and had sat in the car with his cousin for 12 hours waiting for the ribbon to be cut so they could be the first to drive across the bridge that linked Jeffersonville to Louisville, Kentucky. My father was given a bronze medallion that day at the ceremony to commemorate the bridge opening. I still have that medallion.
 
:''The story of the bridge collapse was not given to me by my Dad or by Brother Billy, but by my grandmother, Maud, and by a lady named Dorothy Phillips. She was about my dad’s age and went to church with us at St. Luke’s United Church of Christ. She was telling me about being a little girl watching the construction from the river bank. Remember, that although the depression had not “officially” begun, things were not very good economically in Jeffersonville at that time. Many people had no diversions, and spent time watching the construction of this bridge, as I am sure Brother Billy and my dad did as well. Dorothy recalled seeing scaffolding up around the piling in the first water pile, and she recalled it collapsing while there was a major cement pour and she saw men falling into the cement who were never removed. It was a tragedy at the time, and many people were appalled.
 
===Problem #1 - The age of Jack's grandmother===
 
I called Jack Vissing regarding questions that I after reviewing his story about his grandmother.  In my conversation with Jack Vissing, he stated that it was his grandmother who had witnessed this as a young girl.
 
If so, this is a clear case of Jack Vissing getting the Big Four bridge confused with the Municipal Bridge.'''  If Jack's father was 14 in 1929, then it is obvious that his grandmother could not have been a young girl at the same time.  However, she would have been a young girl in 1895, when the Big Four bridge had 3 different fatal accidents as noted above.  Also, the 16 men that died in the construction of the caissons (on two separate occasions) would appear to be very close the description of the accident that she saw.
 
===Problem #2 - Nothing reported in the newspapers===
 
Jack states that "t was a tragedy at the time, and many people were appalled."
 
If this was widespread knowledge at the time it happened, '''why was it not reported in the local papers when two other deaths made the front page?'''
 
If sixteen men died, how could this be kept secret given the mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and wives of the people that supposedly died.  How would you keep all of them quiet?
 
There were two men who did die in the construction of the municipal bridge and whose deaths made the front page of the  Jeffersonville newspaper.  The fact that there was no reporting of these deaths argues for it never having happened.  Again, we think Jack's grandmother confused this with the death of the men on the Big Four bridge.
 
===Problem #3 - The myth of men drowning in concrete===
 
From an engineering perspective, this story is so implausible it is funny.  But that is the lengths that people will go to because of [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]].
 
This story is also told with respect to the construction of the Hoover Dam. The story goes that a number of workers were entombed in concrete as the pour couldn't be stopped and they were left dead in the concrete.  However, this has been proved to have been not possible.  There is an article on this subject on the [https://www.ripleys.com/weird-news/bodies-hoover-dam/ Ripley's Believe It or Not] website. 
 
The reasons that clearly indicate that it COULD NEVER happen are as follows:
 
#The structural integrity of the concrete would fail with even one body in it, let alone sixteen.  The concrete pier would have crumbled and collapsed a long time ago.  The reason for this is that the human body decomposes in concrete and leaves a massive air pocket.  Imagine that there are sixteen such large air pockets.  The bridge pilon would have collapsed after a few years.
#Rebar is used extensively in concrete to provide strength.  This means there is no room for a single body to be submerged in the concrete.  Could sixteen bodies have been submerged?  It is impossible.
#This would have been reported in the engineers' report.
 
===Problem #3 - Jack's client is Voice of God Recordings===
 
We talked on the phone with Jack Vissing and he confirmed that that Voice of God Recordings was a client of his law firm.  Would you trust the testimony of a man who was getting paid by the people he was testifying for?  This is clearly a conflict of interest.
 
=A Big Question=
William Branham said he was living in Arizona, not Jeffersonville, when the Municipal Bridge was built.  When he returned to Jeffersonville on the news of his brother's passing in 1929, the new bridge would have been a significant new landmark.  Perhaps he recalled hearing stories of accidents on the Big Four bridge as a child, and confused them with the new bridge that had been built.  However, William Branham repeats that he remembered the vision, and that his mother wrote it down - which means he should have been accurate in retelling the vision. 
 
This should raise serious concerns about William Branham's credibility as a prophet, such as:
*If this vision was fabricated, were any other visions fabricated as well? 
*If this was a false prophecy (claimed to be accurate) are there other false prophecies? 
 
If you are interested in further detailed research on this vision, you should go to the [[Searching for Vindication]] website. 
 
=Video Script=


William Branham tells of a vision that he had as a young boy...   
William Branham tells of a vision that he had as a young boy...   
Line 425: Line 203:
'''If you have any additional facts relating to the subject of this video information, please contact us.'''
'''If you have any additional facts relating to the subject of this video information, please contact us.'''


=Quotes=
==Quotes of william Branham==


The following are all of the quotes where William Branham mentions this vision:
The following are all of the quotes where William Branham mentions this vision:
Line 514: Line 292:
:''Exactly seventeen years from that day, the Municipal Bridge at Jeffersonville spanned over to Kentucky, and the seventh... And the sixteen man lost their life on it, just exactly like it said. Ah, so did Mr. Unbeliever has tempted me all along!
:''Exactly seventeen years from that day, the Municipal Bridge at Jeffersonville spanned over to Kentucky, and the seventh... And the sixteen man lost their life on it, just exactly like it said. Ah, so did Mr. Unbeliever has tempted me all along!


=Reference=
=References=
*Allgeier, M.A. (1983). Louisville Municipal Bridge, Pylons, and Administrative Building, Louisville Landmarks Commission.
*Allgeier, M.A. (1983). Louisville Municipal Bridge, Pylons, and Administrative Building, Louisville Landmarks Commission.
*The Encyclopedia of Louisville (1 ed.). 2001.
*The Encyclopedia of Louisville (1 ed.). 2001.
Line 520: Line 298:
*National Register of Historic Places
*National Register of Historic Places
*The Jeffersonville Evening News reported two deaths on its front page on Thursday, June 30, 1929.  One death was Edward Branham, William Branham's brother, who died of rheumatism of the heart.  The second death was Richard Pilton, the first fatality during the construction of the Bridge, who died when an iron crank he was using struck him in the temple.  
*The Jeffersonville Evening News reported two deaths on its front page on Thursday, June 30, 1929.  One death was Edward Branham, William Branham's brother, who died of rheumatism of the heart.  The second death was Richard Pilton, the first fatality during the construction of the Bridge, who died when an iron crank he was using struck him in the temple.  
*[http://searchingforvindication.com/2013/04/06/Summary-Of-Municipal-Bridge/ Summary of historical data on Searching For Vindication]
*[http://searchingforvindication.com/2013/04/06/Summary-Of-Municipal-Bridge Summary of historical data on Searching For Vindication]


{{Failed Visions}}
{{Failed Visions}}


{{Bottom of Page No Ref}}
{{Bottom of Page No Ref}}
[[index.php?title=Category:Prophecies and Visions]]
[[Category:Prophecies and Visions]]
[[index.php?title=Category:Prophecies]]
[[Category:Prophecies]]
[[index.php?title=Category:Visions]]
[[Category:Visions]]
[[index.php?title=Category:Honesty and Credibility]]
[[Category:Honesty and Credibility]]
Retrieved from "https://en.believethesign.com/index.php/The_Municipal_Bridge_Vision"