Franklin D. Roosevelt: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Notice what is happening across this timeline. The prophecy begins (in 1958) with the relatively modest claim that FDR would win a fourth term. It then escalates dramatically in late 1960 to the claim that FDR directly and actively ''caused'' WWII. It then quietly retreats from that bold claim — from "caused" to "helped cause" — before eventually returning to the softer original version in August 1961. | Notice what is happening across this timeline. The prophecy begins (in 1958) with the relatively modest claim that FDR would win a fourth term. It then escalates dramatically in late 1960 to the claim that FDR directly and actively ''caused'' WWII. It then quietly retreats from that bold claim — from "caused" to "helped cause" — before eventually returning to the softer original version in August 1961. | ||
After 1961, the FDR prophecy disappears entirely. When the Church Ages Book was published in 1965, the reference to Roosevelt was replaced by a prophecy about Hitler — without acknowledgment or explanation | After 1961, the FDR prophecy disappears entirely. When the Church Ages Book was published in 1965, the reference to Roosevelt was replaced by a prophecy about Hitler — without acknowledgment or explanation. | ||
If a prophecy is "on paper," its content does not evolve. Its scope does not expand under enthusiasm and contract under scrutiny. A document either says what it says or it does not. What we see instead is a prophecy whose content tracked the rhetorical needs of its teller, not the fixed record of a divine revelation. | If a prophecy is "on paper," its content does not evolve. Its scope does not expand under enthusiasm and contract under scrutiny. A document either says what it says or it does not. What we see instead is a prophecy whose content tracked the rhetorical needs of its teller, not the fixed record of a divine revelation. | ||
| Line 99: | Line 97: | ||
This is significant for two reasons. First, it was Branham and his editor Lee Vayle who made this substitution — replacing FDR with Hitler as the war-causing figure. Second, this is the very book in which Branham challenges readers: ''"Can anyone prove any of those visions wrong?"'' | This is significant for two reasons. First, it was Branham and his editor Lee Vayle who made this substitution — replacing FDR with Hitler as the war-causing figure. Second, this is the very book in which Branham challenges readers: ''"Can anyone prove any of those visions wrong?"'' | ||
He removed the vision that could be proven wrong, then asked if any vision could be proven wrong. | '''He removed the vision that could be proven wrong, then asked if any vision could be proven wrong.''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 113: | Line 111: | ||
When confronted with this evidence, some Message believers have appealed to fringe historical sources alleging that FDR secretly orchestrated WWII and that Roosevelt was indeed the sinister warmonger Branham described. This response deserves a direct reply — both about the sources and the logic. | When confronted with this evidence, some Message believers have appealed to fringe historical sources alleging that FDR secretly orchestrated WWII and that Roosevelt was indeed the sinister warmonger Branham described. This response deserves a direct reply — both about the sources and the logic. | ||
'''On the sources:''' The primary website circulated in these arguments is operated by an organization widely identified by historians as the leading Holocaust denial organization in the world. Its purpose is to minimize Nazi crimes and rehabilitate convicted war criminals. Citing this source in a theological argument about a Christian minister is not simply a logical error — it is a moral one. | '''On the sources:''' The primary website circulated in these arguments is operated by an organization widely identified by historians as the leading Holocaust denial organization in the world. Its purpose is to minimize Nazi crimes and rehabilitate convicted war criminals. <u>Citing this source in a theological argument about a Christian minister is not simply a logical error — it is a moral one.</u> | ||
'''On the substance:''' Even setting aside the source, the historical argument fails on its own terms. The claim that FDR secretly engineered WWII is rejected not only by mainstream historians, but by the documented timeline: Germany was already at war with Britain, France, and Poland before any American policy could have "caused" a world war. The war was not caused in Washington — it was launched from Berlin. | '''On the substance:''' Even setting aside the source, the historical argument fails on its own terms. The claim that FDR secretly engineered WWII is rejected not only by mainstream historians, but by the documented timeline: Germany was already at war with Britain, France, and Poland before any American policy could have "caused" a world war. The war was not caused in Washington — it was launched from Berlin. | ||
| Line 135: | Line 133: | ||
----''For further examination of the 1933 visions and William Branham's prophetic claims, see [[Under The Halo|Under the Halo: Examining the Legacy of William Branham]] and the full analysis of [[An Analysis of William Branham's Visions and Prophecies|Branham's Visions and Prophecies]].'' | ----''For further examination of the 1933 visions and William Branham's prophetic claims, see [[Under The Halo|Under the Halo: Examining the Legacy of William Branham]] and the full analysis of [[An Analysis of William Branham's Visions and Prophecies|Branham's Visions and Prophecies]].'' | ||
----{{Bottom of Page}} | ----{{Bottom of Page}} | ||
[[Category:Prophecies and Visions of William Branham]] | [[index.php?title=Category:Prophecies and Visions of William Branham]] | ||
[[Category:1933 Visions]] | [[index.php?title=Category:1933 Visions]] | ||