16
edits
The Pope and the Lunar Eclipse: Difference between revisions
→Was the timing supernatural?
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Was the lunar eclipse a sign?== | ==Was the lunar eclipse a sign?== | ||
It is interesting that the lunar eclpise could not be seen (it was not even partial) in either Rome or in Israel. One would have thought that if God was showing something supernatural in the heavens that he would have got the eclipse to cover at least Israel. | It is interesting that the lunar eclpise could not be seen (it was not even partial) in either Rome or in Israel.<ref>www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/lunar/1963-december-30</ref> One would have thought that if God was showing something supernatural in the heavens that he would have got the eclipse to cover at least Israel. | ||
==Was the timing supernatural?== | ==Was the timing supernatural?== | ||
The eclipse happened | The eclipse happened approximately a week prior to the Pope going to Jerusalem. One would also have thought that if it was truly supernatural that would have occured while the Pope was in Israel. Why couldn't God at least get that right? | ||
==Did the eclipse happen in seven stages?== | ==Did the eclipse happen in seven stages?== | ||