It's a revelation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

It's a revelation (view source)

Revision as of 06:27, 15 January 2016

1,332 bytes added , 8 years ago

→‎What is a "revelation"?

Admin

Bots, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, nuke, Suppressors, Administrators

11,143

edits

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 :''ἀπολογία, ας, ἡ (s. ἀπολογέομαι; Pre-Socr., Thu. et al.; pap, e.g. BGU 531, 21 [I A.D.]; PLips 58, 18; Wsd 6:10; TestSol; Jos. C. Ap. 2, 147; Ar., Just.) freq. as legal term.
 ::1. a speech of defense, defense, reply ἀκούσατέ μου τῆς πρὸς ὑμᾶς νυνὶ ἀπολογίας hear the defense which I now make to you Ac 22:1 (ἀ. πρός τινα as X., Mem. 4, 8, 5). ἡ ἐμὴ ἀ. τοῖς ἐμὲ ἀνακρίνουσιν my reply to those who sit in judgment over me 1 Cor 9:3. Written defense, apology Qua (1).
-::2. ② the act of making a defense, defense
+::2. the act of making a defense, defense
 :::a. in court (Jos., Bell. 1, 621) ἐν τ. πρώτῃ μου ἀ. at my first defense 2 Ti 4:16 (s. πρῶτος 1aαא). τόπον ἀπολογίας λαμβάνειν περί τινος receive an opportunity to defend himself concerning someth. Ac 25:16.
 :::b. gener. of eagerness to defend oneself 2 Cor 7:11. Of defending the gospel Phil 1:7, 16. ἕτοιμοι πρὸς ἀπολογίαν παντί ready to make a defense to anyone 1 Pt 3:15.<ref>William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, and Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 117.</ref>
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 Here are some examples of where the same Greek word ἀπολογία is used elsewhere in the New Testament:
-:''And when he had given him permission, Paul, standing on the steps, motioned with his hand to the people. And when there was a great hush, he addressed them in the Hebrew language, saying:
+:''And when he had given him permission, Paul, standing on the steps, motioned with his hand to the people. And when there was a great hush, he addressed them in the Hebrew language, saying: “Brothers and fathers, '''hear the defense that I now make before you'''.”<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Ac 21:40–22:1.</ref>
- “Brothers and fathers, '''hear the defense that I now make before you'''.”<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Ac 21:40–22:1.</ref>
 :''I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to give up anyone before the accused met the accusers face to face and had opportunity to '''make his defense concerning the charge''' laid against him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Ac 25:16.</ref>
 :''Alexander the coppersmith did me great harm; the Lord will repay him according to his deeds.  Beware of him yourself, for he strongly opposed our message.  '''At my first defense''' no one came to stand by me, but all deserted me. May it not be charged against them!  But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, so that through me the message might be fully proclaimed and all the Gentiles might hear it. So I was rescued from the lion’s mouth.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Ti 4:14–17.</ref>
+==Shouldn't revelation make things clearer?==
+Imagine you are looking at a sculpture that is covered and another person looking on claims that the sculptor has already given him a look at the uncovered sculpture.
+People are speculating as to what it could be...
+One says, "that long part looks like it could be an elephant's trunk"
+Another says, "it's a giraffe"
+A person who has actually already seen the "revealed" sculpture cannot convey perfectly what he has seen, but their explanation of what the onlookers are seeing should make more sense than their own speculation.
+For instance, he might say, "actually that's not an elephant's trunk or a giraffe. It's actually a general on a rearing horse and what you see there is his extended arm and sword."
+The very definition of reveal means its recipient should be able to bring increased clarity, not increased mystery.
+If the person claiming to have already seen the sculpture said something like, "I can't explain what those shapes are. It's a revelation." That would be non-sensical.
+Yet, that is basically what we get told about twisted message scriptural interpretation, Willliam Branham's false visions and prophesies, vindication snafus, and the like.
+It's just nonsensical.
 =Conclusion=
-Imagine standing in front of a judge to give a defense for your actions where you are on trial criminally.  Would it suffice to say: "Sorry, your honor, you can't understand my actions.  It's a revelation."?
+Imagine standing in front of a judge to give a defense for your actions where you are on trial criminally.  Would it be acceptable to say: "Sorry, your honor, you can't understand my actions.  It's a revelation." and think the judge will understand?
-I think not.
+'''I think not.'''
-Neither is it acceptable from a scripture to evade any real answer to a question posed to a message follower.
+Neither is it acceptable, from a scripture standpoint, for a message follower to evade any real answer to a question posed to them about their faith.
 {{Bottom of Page}}