Pergamos - Revision history

Admin at 04:44, 13 July 2026

2026-07-13T04:44:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 13 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:7 Church Ages}}		{{Template:7 Church Ages}}
			{{7 Messengers}}
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}
	'''Pergamos''' (Greek: '''Πέργαμος''', meaning "height or elevation", modern day '''Bergama''' in Turkey) was an ancient Greek city, in Mysia, northwestern Anatolia, 16 miles from the Aegean Sea, located on a promontory on the north side of the river Caicus (modern day Bakırçay), that became an important kingdom during the Hellenistic period, under the Attalid dynasty, 282-129 BC.		'''Pergamos''' (Greek: '''Πέργαμος''', meaning "height or elevation", modern day '''Bergama''' in Turkey) was an ancient Greek city, in Mysia, northwestern Anatolia, 16 miles from the Aegean Sea, located on a promontory on the north side of the river Caicus (modern day Bakırçay), that became an important kingdom during the Hellenistic period, under the Attalid dynasty, 282-129 BC.

Admin: /* 1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline */

2026-07-13T03:14:44Z

1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 13 July 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=		=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=

	==1. The Plagiarized ~~and Impossible~~ Timeline==		==1. The Plagiarized Timeline==

	William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.		William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.

	~~But when we bring these dates to the auditing table, the ledger does not balance:~~		'''The Chronological Clash''': Martin of Tours was born in AD 316. But William Branham said that God ALWAYS sent the messenger at the end of the age. OOPS!

	* '''The Chronological Clash''': Martin of Tours was born in AD 316. ~~This means~~ that ~~for the first four years of his own allotted Church Age,~~ the messenger ~~was not even alive.~~
	* '''The Silent Centuries''': Even more damning is that Martin died in AD 397. For the ~~remaining '''209 years'''~~ of the ~~Pergamean Age (from 397 to 606), the messenger was dead and buried. How can a man "influence his~~ age ~~for God" when he has been in his grave for more than two centuries?~~
	* '''The Source of the Error''': This was not a divine revelation. William Branham simply copied these dates verbatim from page 23 of Clarence Larkin’s 1919 book, ''The Book of Revelation''. Larkin set up these boundaries based on his own dispensational framework. Branham adopted these boundaries without realizing that they created an impossible timeline for his chosen messenger.

	----		----

Admin: /* 1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline */

2026-07-13T03:09:18Z

1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 13 July 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=		=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=

	=1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline=		==1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline==

	William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.		William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.

Admin: /* =1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline */

2026-07-13T03:08:53Z

=1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 13 July 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=		=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=

	==1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline=		=1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline=

	William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.		William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.

Admin at 03:08, 13 July 2026

2026-07-13T03:08:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 13 July 2026
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:''The land of Egypt, the praises of which you have been recounting to me, my dear Servianus, I have found to be wholly light-minded, unstable, and blown about by every breath of rumour. There those who worship Serapis are, in fact, Christians, and those who call themselves bishops of Christ are, in fact, devotees of Serapis. There is no chief of the Jewish synagogue, no Samaritan, no Christian presbyter, who is not an astrologer, a soothsayer, or an anointer. Even the Patriarch himself, when he comes to Egypt, is forced by some to worship Serapis, by others to worship Christ.'' (''Augustan History'', [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/Firmus_et_al*.html#8 Firmus et al. 8])''		:''The land of Egypt, the praises of which you have been recounting to me, my dear Servianus, I have found to be wholly light-minded, unstable, and blown about by every breath of rumour. There those who worship Serapis are, in fact, Christians, and those who call themselves bishops of Christ are, in fact, devotees of Serapis. There is no chief of the Jewish synagogue, no Samaritan, no Christian presbyter, who is not an astrologer, a soothsayer, or an anointer. Even the Patriarch himself, when he comes to Egypt, is forced by some to worship Serapis, by others to worship Christ.'' (''Augustan History'', [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/Firmus_et_al*.html#8 Firmus et al. 8])''
	~~Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book~~

	~~'''~~1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline~~'''~~		=Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book=

			==1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline=

	William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.		William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.
Line 31:		Line 32:
	* '''The Source of the Error''': This was not a divine revelation. William Branham simply copied these dates verbatim from page 23 of Clarence Larkin’s 1919 book, ''The Book of Revelation''. Larkin set up these boundaries based on his own dispensational framework. Branham adopted these boundaries without realizing that they created an impossible timeline for his chosen messenger.		* '''The Source of the Error''': This was not a divine revelation. William Branham simply copied these dates verbatim from page 23 of Clarence Larkin’s 1919 book, ''The Book of Revelation''. Larkin set up these boundaries based on his own dispensational framework. Branham adopted these boundaries without realizing that they created an impossible timeline for his chosen messenger.

	----~~'''~~2. The Pontifex Maximus Myth~~'''~~		----
			==2. The Pontifex Maximus Myth==

	In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11 and 13''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham presents a highly dramatic historical pedigree to explain the rise of "Mystery Babylon". He claims that when Babylon fell, the pagan priesthood, led by "priest-king" Attalus, fled to Pergamos. He then asserts that Attalus III willed this spiritual and physical Babylonian kingdom to Rome, allowing Julius Caesar and subsequent Roman Emperors to take the pagan title "Pontifex Maximus" and act as Babylon's priest-kings, which eventually passed to the Pope of Rome.		In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11 and 13''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham presents a highly dramatic historical pedigree to explain the rise of "Mystery Babylon". He claims that when Babylon fell, the pagan priesthood, led by "priest-king" Attalus, fled to Pergamos. He then asserts that Attalus III willed this spiritual and physical Babylonian kingdom to Rome, allowing Julius Caesar and subsequent Roman Emperors to take the pagan title "Pontifex Maximus" and act as Babylon's priest-kings, which eventually passed to the Pope of Rome.
Line 41:		Line 43:
	* '''The Source of the Fallacy''': William Branham copied this entire narrative almost word for word from Alexander Hislop's 1853 book, ''The Two Babylons''. Hislop’s work has long been discredited by historians as a collection of logical fallacies, conspiracy theories, and historical errors. To build an entire eschatological doctrine on a historically fabricated pedigree of priesthood transfers is an error of monumental proportions. It is a '''False Premise Fallacy''' used to support a '''False Analogy'''.		* '''The Source of the Fallacy''': William Branham copied this entire narrative almost word for word from Alexander Hislop's 1853 book, ''The Two Babylons''. Hislop’s work has long been discredited by historians as a collection of logical fallacies, conspiracy theories, and historical errors. To build an entire eschatological doctrine on a historically fabricated pedigree of priesthood transfers is an error of monumental proportions. It is a '''False Premise Fallacy''' used to support a '''False Analogy'''.

	----~~'''~~3. The Trinitarian, Monastic Messenger~~'''~~		----
			==3. The Trinitarian, Monastic Messenger==

	Branham argued that the True Church and its messengers must be "unorganized," bitterly opposing any form of episcopal hierarchy, centralized church government, or human authority. He picked Martin of Tours as the messenger to Pergamos to represent this anti-establishment, "unorganized" true vine.		Branham argued that the True Church and its messengers must be "unorganized," bitterly opposing any form of episcopal hierarchy, centralized church government, or human authority. He picked Martin of Tours as the messenger to Pergamos to represent this anti-establishment, "unorganized" true vine.
Line 52:		Line 55:
	* '''The Logical Contradiction''': In his sermon ''The Sardisean Church Age'' (December 9, 1960), paragraph 171, Branham declared that the doctrine of the Trinity was "of the devil" and a "Satanic heresy". If this is true, then his chosen "messenger" of the Pergamean Age was a dedicated defender of a Satanic heresy who spent his life organizing Catholic monasteries. The argument destroys itself.		* '''The Logical Contradiction''': In his sermon ''The Sardisean Church Age'' (December 9, 1960), paragraph 171, Branham declared that the doctrine of the Trinity was "of the devil" and a "Satanic heresy". If this is true, then his chosen "messenger" of the Pergamean Age was a dedicated defender of a Satanic heresy who spent his life organizing Catholic monasteries. The argument destroys itself.

	----~~'''~~4. The Priscillianist Perversion~~'''~~		----
			==4. The Priscillianist Perversion==

	To illustrate the "two vines" of church history, Branham recounts the tragic story of the Priscillianists, who were executed at the Synod of Treves in AD 385. In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11, 13, and 117''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham characterizes the Priscillianists as "true believers" of the "true vine" who were slaughtered by the "false vine" of the formal church because they stood for the pure Word of God.		To illustrate the "two vines" of church history, Branham recounts the tragic story of the Priscillianists, who were executed at the Synod of Treves in AD 385. In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11, 13, and 117''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham characterizes the Priscillianists as "true believers" of the "true vine" who were slaughtered by the "false vine" of the formal church because they stood for the pure Word of God.
Line 62:		Line 66:
	* '''The Real Opposition''': Martin of Tours and Ambrose of Milan did oppose the execution of the Priscillianists. However, they did so because they believed the church should not employ the death penalty, not because they endorsed Priscillian’s Gnostic theology. Martin was a staunch Trinitarian who fought Gnostic heresies his entire life. By portraying Priscillian as a saint and Martin’s spiritual brother in a "non-Trinitarian true vine," Branham fabricated a historical narrative that never existed.		* '''The Real Opposition''': Martin of Tours and Ambrose of Milan did oppose the execution of the Priscillianists. However, they did so because they believed the church should not employ the death penalty, not because they endorsed Priscillian’s Gnostic theology. Martin was a staunch Trinitarian who fought Gnostic heresies his entire life. By portraying Priscillian as a saint and Martin’s spiritual brother in a "non-Trinitarian true vine," Branham fabricated a historical narrative that never existed.

	----~~'''~~5. The Monarchical Pastor Contradiction~~'''~~		----
			==5. The Monarchical Pastor Contradiction==

	In '''Chapter 10 ("A Resume of the Ages")''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham condemns the "Nicolaitane" system of a "monarchical episcopate" (having a single bishop or pastor rule over a local church) as a satanic organization that "subjugates the laity" and strips them of their spiritual freedom.		In '''Chapter 10 ("A Resume of the Ages")''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham condemns the "Nicolaitane" system of a "monarchical episcopate" (having a single bishop or pastor rule over a local church) as a satanic organization that "subjugates the laity" and strips them of their spiritual freedom.
Line 71:		Line 76:

	This is a classic '''Ad Hominem and Circular Contradiction'''. He bitterly condemned the very structure of local pastoral supremacy in history that he enforced in his own tabernacle. If a single pastor ruling a local congregation is a Nicolaitane heresy when Ignatius of Antioch suggested it, why is it a divine order when William Branham practiced it?		This is a classic '''Ad Hominem and Circular Contradiction'''. He bitterly condemned the very structure of local pastoral supremacy in history that he enforced in his own tabernacle. If a single pastor ruling a local congregation is a Nicolaitane heresy when Ignatius of Antioch suggested it, why is it a divine order when William Branham practiced it?
	----~~'''~~Conclusion~~'''~~		----
			==Conclusion==
	When ~~I was in the Message, I didn't see these things. I was too busy defending the system. But when you~~ are forced to look at the facts, ~~you~~ realize that '''the rules of logic and historical integrity are not an optional, academic game'''. They flow from the very rational, truthful nature of God Himself.		When we are forced to look at the facts, we realize that '''the rules of logic and historical integrity are not an optional, academic game'''. They flow from the very rational, truthful nature of God Himself.

	A prophet's message cannot be built on plagiarized timelines, historically fabricated pagan transfers, and deep theological contradictions. Martin of Tours was a Trinitarian bishop who organized monasteries. The Priscillianists were Gnostics who denied the physical incarnation of Christ. These are not debatable opinions; they are documented historical facts.		A prophet's message cannot be built on plagiarized timelines, historically fabricated pagan transfers, and deep theological contradictions. Martin of Tours was a Trinitarian bishop who organized monasteries. The Priscillianists were Gnostics who denied the physical incarnation of Christ. These are not debatable opinions; they are documented historical facts.

Admin at 03:05, 13 July 2026

2026-07-13T03:05:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 13 July 2026
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:''The land of Egypt, the praises of which you have been recounting to me, my dear Servianus, I have found to be wholly light-minded, unstable, and blown about by every breath of rumour. There those who worship Serapis are, in fact, Christians, and those who call themselves bishops of Christ are, in fact, devotees of Serapis. There is no chief of the Jewish synagogue, no Samaritan, no Christian presbyter, who is not an astrologer, a soothsayer, or an anointer. Even the Patriarch himself, when he comes to Egypt, is forced by some to worship Serapis, by others to worship Christ.'' (''Augustan History'', [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/Firmus_et_al*.html#8 Firmus et al. 8])''		:''The land of Egypt, the praises of which you have been recounting to me, my dear Servianus, I have found to be wholly light-minded, unstable, and blown about by every breath of rumour. There those who worship Serapis are, in fact, Christians, and those who call themselves bishops of Christ are, in fact, devotees of Serapis. There is no chief of the Jewish synagogue, no Samaritan, no Christian presbyter, who is not an astrologer, a soothsayer, or an anointer. Even the Patriarch himself, when he comes to Egypt, is forced by some to worship Serapis, by others to worship Christ.'' (''Augustan History'', [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/Firmus_et_al*.html#8 Firmus et al. 8])''
			Historical accuracy in the Church Age Book

			'''1. The Plagiarized and Impossible Timeline'''

			William Branham claimed that God gave him the exact dates and timelines of the Seven Church Ages by divine revelation. In his sermon series, he assigned the '''Pergamean Church Age''' to the period between '''AD 312 and AD 606''', and chose '''Martin of Tours''' (c. AD 316 to 397) as its messenger.

			But when we bring these dates to the auditing table, the ledger does not balance:

			* '''The Chronological Clash''': Martin of Tours was born in AD 316. This means that for the first four years of his own allotted Church Age, the messenger was not even alive.
			* '''The Silent Centuries''': Even more damning is that Martin died in AD 397. For the remaining '''209 years''' of the Pergamean Age (from 397 to 606), the messenger was dead and buried. How can a man "influence his age for God" when he has been in his grave for more than two centuries?
			* '''The Source of the Error''': This was not a divine revelation. William Branham simply copied these dates verbatim from page 23 of Clarence Larkin’s 1919 book, ''The Book of Revelation''. Larkin set up these boundaries based on his own dispensational framework. Branham adopted these boundaries without realizing that they created an impossible timeline for his chosen messenger.

			----'''2. The Pontifex Maximus Myth'''

			In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11 and 13''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham presents a highly dramatic historical pedigree to explain the rise of "Mystery Babylon". He claims that when Babylon fell, the pagan priesthood, led by "priest-king" Attalus, fled to Pergamos. He then asserts that Attalus III willed this spiritual and physical Babylonian kingdom to Rome, allowing Julius Caesar and subsequent Roman Emperors to take the pagan title "Pontifex Maximus" and act as Babylon's priest-kings, which eventually passed to the Pope of Rome.

			When we test this claim against historical records, we find that it is a complete fabrication:

			* '''The Hellenistic Reality''': Attalus III was a Greek (Hellenistic) king of Pergamos. He was not a Babylonian priest-king, and he had no connection to Nimrod’s ancient line. The kingdom of Pergamos was Greek, not Babylonian.
			* '''A Purely Roman Office''': Julius Caesar did not become Pontifex Maximus because of Attalus's will. The office of Pontifex Maximus was an ancient Roman political-religious office that existed in Rome since the foundation of the Republic in 509 BC, nearly four hundred years before Attalus III willed his kingdom to Rome in 133 BC.
			* '''The Source of the Fallacy''': William Branham copied this entire narrative almost word for word from Alexander Hislop's 1853 book, ''The Two Babylons''. Hislop’s work has long been discredited by historians as a collection of logical fallacies, conspiracy theories, and historical errors. To build an entire eschatological doctrine on a historically fabricated pedigree of priesthood transfers is an error of monumental proportions. It is a '''False Premise Fallacy''' used to support a '''False Analogy'''.

			----'''3. The Trinitarian, Monastic Messenger'''

			Branham argued that the True Church and its messengers must be "unorganized," bitterly opposing any form of episcopal hierarchy, centralized church government, or human authority. He picked Martin of Tours as the messenger to Pergamos to represent this anti-establishment, "unorganized" true vine.

			But this argument is completely '''self-defeating''':

			* '''A Catholic Bishop''': Martin of Tours was not a dissident rebel operating outside the church. He was a consecrated, ordained '''Catholic Bishop of Tours''' who worked in full communion with the structured church of his day.
			* '''The Father of Monasticism''': Martin is historically famous for '''founding and organizing''' the first monastic communities in Europe, including the Ligugé Abbey and Marmoutier Abbey. Monasticism is one of the most highly structured, organized forms of religious life in Christian history.
			* '''A Dedicated Trinitarian''': Martin was a student and close friend of Hilary of Poitiers, who was one of the premier defenders of Nicene Christianity and the doctrine of the Trinity against the Arian heresy. Martin spent his entire ministry defending the doctrine of the Trinity.
			* '''The Logical Contradiction''': In his sermon ''The Sardisean Church Age'' (December 9, 1960), paragraph 171, Branham declared that the doctrine of the Trinity was "of the devil" and a "Satanic heresy". If this is true, then his chosen "messenger" of the Pergamean Age was a dedicated defender of a Satanic heresy who spent his life organizing Catholic monasteries. The argument destroys itself.

			----'''4. The Priscillianist Perversion'''

			To illustrate the "two vines" of church history, Branham recounts the tragic story of the Priscillianists, who were executed at the Synod of Treves in AD 385. In '''Chapter 5, paragraphs 11, 13, and 117''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham characterizes the Priscillianists as "true believers" of the "true vine" who were slaughtered by the "false vine" of the formal church because they stood for the pure Word of God.

			This represents a severe '''Category Error''' and a profound historical and scriptural misinterpretation:

			* '''The Gnostic Heresy''': Priscillianism was not a "pure gospel" movement. It was a highly heterodox Gnostic-Manichaean sect. Priscillian denied the real, physical incarnation and birth of Jesus Christ, teaching a form of Docetism. He condemned marriage as sinful, claimed the human body was a prison created by the devil, and taught that our physical bodies are ruled by the twelve signs of the zodiac. He also denied the resurrection of the physical body.
			* '''Defending Docetism''': By defending Priscillian and his followers as the "true vine," Branham was endorsing heresies that undermine the very foundation of Christian redemption. If Christ did not have a real physical body and did not physically rise from the dead, then our faith is in vain.
			* '''The Real Opposition''': Martin of Tours and Ambrose of Milan did oppose the execution of the Priscillianists. However, they did so because they believed the church should not employ the death penalty, not because they endorsed Priscillian’s Gnostic theology. Martin was a staunch Trinitarian who fought Gnostic heresies his entire life. By portraying Priscillian as a saint and Martin’s spiritual brother in a "non-Trinitarian true vine," Branham fabricated a historical narrative that never existed.

			----'''5. The Monarchical Pastor Contradiction'''

			In '''Chapter 10 ("A Resume of the Ages")''' of the ''Church Age Book'', Branham condemns the "Nicolaitane" system of a "monarchical episcopate" (having a single bishop or pastor rule over a local church) as a satanic organization that "subjugates the laity" and strips them of their spiritual freedom.

			Yet throughout his ministry, Branham insisted on this exact same structure of local church government:

			''"The pastor is always the head of the church, the pastor is always. That’s God’s elder... there's no higher order in the Bible than the elder of the church... which is the pastor."'' (Sermon: ''The Ephesian Church Age'', December 5, 1960, paragraph 54)

			This is a classic '''Ad Hominem and Circular Contradiction'''. He bitterly condemned the very structure of local pastoral supremacy in history that he enforced in his own tabernacle. If a single pastor ruling a local congregation is a Nicolaitane heresy when Ignatius of Antioch suggested it, why is it a divine order when William Branham practiced it?
			----'''Conclusion'''

			When I was in the Message, I didn't see these things. I was too busy defending the system. But when you are forced to look at the facts, you realize that '''the rules of logic and historical integrity are not an optional, academic game'''. They flow from the very rational, truthful nature of God Himself.

			A prophet's message cannot be built on plagiarized timelines, historically fabricated pagan transfers, and deep theological contradictions. Martin of Tours was a Trinitarian bishop who organized monasteries. The Priscillianists were Gnostics who denied the physical incarnation of Christ. These are not debatable opinions; they are documented historical facts.

			When a minister tells you to completely bypass your own mind and accept his illustrations without testing them, he is not asking for deep faith. '''He is asking for blind submission'''. The Bible never tells us to shut off our understanding. It tells us to "prove all things; hold fast that which is good."

			My first priority is Jesus Christ, and my walk with Him. If the Message is true, it can survive these questions. If it is not, we must have the courage to walk away. '''Accuracy always beats comfortable illusions.'''

	==External Links==		==External Links==

Admin at 18:28, 22 August 2022

2022-08-22T18:28:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 22 August 2022
Line 26:		Line 26:
	*[http://perso.wanadoo.fr/istanbul/circuit_turquie_voyage_culturel_asie_mineure/PERGAME/index.html Pergamon pictures]		*[http://perso.wanadoo.fr/istanbul/circuit_turquie_voyage_culturel_asie_mineure/PERGAME/index.html Pergamon pictures]
	*{{Wikipedia Reference}}		*{{Wikipedia Reference}}
			{{7 Church Ages Bottom}}
	{{Bottom of Page}}		{{Bottom of Page}}
	[[Category:Doctrines]]		[[Category:Doctrines]]

Admin at 02:18, 31 August 2015

2015-08-31T02:18:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 31 August 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	[[Category:Plagiarism]]		[[Category:Plagiarism]]
	[[Category:William Branham pointing to himself]]		[[Category:William Branham pointing to himself]]
	~~[[Category:The Message]]~~
	~~[[Category:Eschatology]]~~
	~~[[Category:Personal Life]]~~

Admin at 21:29, 23 August 2015

2015-08-23T21:29:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 23 August 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*{{Wikipedia Reference}}		*{{Wikipedia Reference}}

	{{~~Portal Navigation~~}}		{{Bottom of Page}}
	\|-		[[Category:Doctrines]]
	\|}		[[Category:The Seven Church Ages]]
			[[Category:Plagiarism]]
			[[Category:William Branham pointing to himself]]
			[[Category:The Message]]
			[[Category:Eschatology]]
			[[Category:Personal Life]]

Admin at 05:17, 5 July 2015

2015-07-05T05:17:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 5 July 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}
	'''Pergamos''' (Greek: '''Πέργαμος''', meaning "height or elevation", modern day '''Bergama''' in Turkey) was an ancient Greek city, in Mysia, northwestern Anatolia, 16 miles from the Aegean Sea, located on a promontory on the north side of the river Caicus (modern day Bakırçay), that became an important kingdom during the Hellenistic period, under the Attalid dynasty, 282-129 BC.		'''Pergamos''' (Greek: '''Πέργαμος''', meaning "height or elevation", modern day '''Bergama''' in Turkey) was an ancient Greek city, in Mysia, northwestern Anatolia, 16 miles from the Aegean Sea, located on a promontory on the north side of the river Caicus (modern day Bakırçay), that became an important kingdom during the Hellenistic period, under the Attalid dynasty, 282-129 BC.
	~~{{7 Church Ages}}~~
	The Attalids were among the most loyal supporters of Rome among the Hellenistic successor states. For support against the Seleucids, the Attalids were rewarded with all the former Seleucid domains in Asia Minor.		The Attalids were among the most loyal supporters of Rome among the Hellenistic successor states. For support against the Seleucids, the Attalids were rewarded with all the former Seleucid domains in Asia Minor.