Template:Defenders: Difference between revisions

    From BelieveTheSign
    No edit summary
    No edit summary
     
    Line 9: Line 9:
    *[[A response to Tim Pruitt's Defense of William Branham]]
    *[[A response to Tim Pruitt's Defense of William Branham]]
    *[[A response to Jason Watkins' letter to a believer who has left the message]]
    *[[A response to Jason Watkins' letter to a believer who has left the message]]
    *[[A response to Bill Ivy's Defense of the Message]]
    *[[A response to Bill Ivy's Defense of the Message]]<br>

    Latest revision as of 21:32, 30 December 2019

    In December 2019, as a result of another well-respected message minister announcing that he was leaving the message, a few message ministers issued statements attempting to defend William Branham and his message. To date, it has been rare for pastors in the message to address the issues and questions that we and others have brought to the attention of those in the message. As a result, we want to respond to these "defenses" not as a challenge to the authors but rather to inform interested readers of the other side of the issues involved so that you, our readers, can arrive at your own conclusions. We would also be interested in entering into a dialogue on this subject with any of the authors. Each "defense" is included at the bottom of the article.

    If you are aware of any additional defenses of the message by message minisers, please let us know and we will attempt to respond.

    In summary, the purpose of this series of articles is to present a reasoned response to these "defenses".

    Click on the link below to go to the specific topic. You are currently in the article that is in bold.