Supernatural: The Life of William Branham: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

The lack of credible research is reflected throughout the book on an almost constant basis. For example:

#There is a reference to an article in the ''Jeffersonville Evening News'' entitled "Mysterious Star Appears Over Minister While Baptizing", however, based on the work of research performed by [[Searching for Vindication]], it appears that this reference is simply based on a story by William Branham. (Book Two, Pg. 117)

#There is a reference to an article in the ''Jeffersonville Evening News'' entitled "Mysterious Star Appears Over Minister While Baptizing", however, based on the work of research performed by [[Searching for Vindication]], it appears that this reference is simply based on a story by William Branham. It does not appear that the author even attempted to verify whether the newspaper article actually appeared as William Branham stated. (Book Two, Pg. 117)

#The author appears unaware that the name of the church which William Branham first pastored was "The Pentecostal Tabernacle" and later changed it name to Branham Tabernacle. (Book Two, Pg. 134)

#The author appears unaware that the name of the church which William Branham first pastored was "The Pentecostal Tabernacle" and that he later changed the name to Branham Tabernacle. (Book Two, Pg. 134)

#Jorgensen states that in 1954, William Branham dined with King Farouk in Cairo, Egypt, but fails to note that Farouk was forced into exile in 1952 and therefore was not in Egypt in 1954. (Book Four, Pg. 156)

#Jorgensen states that in 1954, William Branham dined with King Farouk in Cairo, Egypt, but fails to note that Farouk was forced into exile in 1952 and therefore William Branham's statement was not true as King Farouk was not in Egypt in 1954. (Book Four, Pg. 156)

#The author states in Book Six, pg. 149 that William Branham "''did not borrow from the past, or copy from his contemporaries; he blazed a new trail''." ~~Even~~ in his analytical comments, he is out of touch with reality. All one has to do is read our article on [[Plagiarism|plagiarism]] to determine how incorrect his statement was.

#The author states in Book Six, pg. 149 that William Branham "''did not borrow from the past, or copy from his contemporaries; he blazed a new trail''", thus demonstrating that even in his analytical comments, Jorgensen is out of touch with reality. All one has to do is read our article on [[Plagiarism|plagiarism]] to determine how incorrect his statement was.