11,141
edits
Prophecy: Danny Henry: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
#Danny Henry was a Baptist (unusual to speak in tongues), | #Danny Henry was a Baptist (unusual to speak in tongues), | ||
#Three French speaking people were present: A woman from Louisiana, a man named Victor Le Doux from Los Angeles, and a French interpreter for the United Nations. Each of these people gave the same interpretation of the prophecy, and Victor Le Doux signed a copy of the prophecy with the following words: | #Three French speaking people were present: A woman from Louisiana, a man named Victor Le Doux from Los Angeles, and a French interpreter for the United Nations. Each of these people gave the same interpretation of the prophecy, and Victor Le Doux signed a copy of the prophecy with the following words: | ||
{| style="border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top" | |||
|''I, Victor Le Doux, am a full-blooded Frenchman; born- again Christian, filled with the Holy Spirit. My address is 809 North King Road, Los Angeles 46. I attend the Bethel Temple, Pastor Arne Vick, pastor. A true translation that I proclaim, of prophecy said over Brother Branham, given by Danny Henry in French, February the 11th, 1961, at the Full Gospel Business Men's breakfast. A true translation of the prophecy.'' | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=Problems with the incident= | |||
{| style="width:118px; padding: 0.3em; float:right; margin-left:15px;border: 1px solid #B8C7D9;" | {| style="width:118px; padding: 0.3em; float:right; margin-left:15px;border: 1px solid #B8C7D9;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 25: | Line 32: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
We have only William Branham's word as to what took place. Given his significant problems with [[Credibility]], we can not take his version of the events as true without corroborating evidence. | We have only William Branham's word as to what took place. Given his significant problems with [[Credibility]], we can not take his version of the events as true without corroborating evidence. | ||