Jump to content

Plum and Apple Trees: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 35: Line 35:
''And if you notice in the vision that I had of the--my ministry, it was... I've never crossed those trees. I have never proselyted. I've never said, "All you trinitarians be oneness" or "all you oneness be trinitarians." I have planted in their own vessels. Just exactly. I went to the trinitarian; I went to the oneness; I went to everybody and stayed between and never joined any of them, but stayed between, being a brother, just exactly what that vision said do. And I've eat the fruit from both sides, salvation on both sides.''
''And if you notice in the vision that I had of the--my ministry, it was... I've never crossed those trees. I have never proselyted. I've never said, "All you trinitarians be oneness" or "all you oneness be trinitarians." I have planted in their own vessels. Just exactly. I went to the trinitarian; I went to the oneness; I went to everybody and stayed between and never joined any of them, but stayed between, being a brother, just exactly what that vision said do. And I've eat the fruit from both sides, salvation on both sides.''


''And now, did you notice, there's many trinitarian people setting here; there's many oneness, and there's many different ones. But how little you would be to fuss about it, because if that part of the vision was true, the other part's true too. Both fruits was found in the cross. See? Both of them was in the cross, all clustered together, and both plums and pear--or peach, plums and apples rained down on me there: both of them. All found in the cross, because they all believed in God and are filled with the Holy Ghost, and have the Christian works and signs following.''
''And now, did you notice, '''there's many trinitarian people setting here; there's many oneness,''' and there's many different ones. But how little you would be to fuss about it, because if that part of the vision was true, the other part's true too. '''Both fruits was found in the cross.''' See? Both of them was in the cross, all clustered together, and both plums and pear--or peach, plums and apples rained down on me there: both of them. '''All found in the cross, because they all believed in God and are filled with the Holy Ghost''', and have the Christian works and signs following.''


''Now, the denomination won't have nothing to do with it. It'll be the borned again that'll have anything to do with it. It'll be your experience with God that'll have to do with it. Now, we see so much of that.''  (Present Stage of My Ministry, September 8, 1962)
''Now, the denomination won't have nothing to do with it. It'll be the borned again that'll have anything to do with it. It'll be your experience with God that'll have to do with it. Now, we see so much of that.''  (Present Stage of My Ministry, September 8, 1962)


 
=Does William Branham later contradict his vision from God?=
=William Branham and Trinitarian Christians=


In 1965, William Branham said:
In 1965, William Branham said:
Line 46: Line 45:
:''“Jesus said, "Except you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins." He is the revelation of God, the Spirit of God revealed in human form. If you can't believe that, you're lost. You put Him a third person, second person, or any other person besides God, you're lost.“'' (July 25, 1965)
:''“Jesus said, "Except you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins." He is the revelation of God, the Spirit of God revealed in human form. If you can't believe that, you're lost. You put Him a third person, second person, or any other person besides God, you're lost.“'' (July 25, 1965)


If William Branham was correct in condemning Trinitarians in 1965, then the vision of the plum and apple trees from 1933 was wrong. If the vision from 1933 is wrong, then William Branham was a false prophet as visions should not be subject to [[Progressive Revelation]].  It is unlikely that God's opinion changed on this subject.  Do you think that William Branham was wrong in his teaching in 1965, or that the 1933 vision was false?
If William Branham was correct in condemning Trinitarians in 1965, then the vision of the plum and apple trees from 1933 was wrong. If the vision from 1933 is wrong, then William Branham was a false prophet as visions should not be subject to [[Progressive Revelation]].  Or did God suddenly change his mind on the subject.  Do you think that William Branham was wrong in his teaching in 1965, or that the 1933 vision was false?


[http://en.believethesign.com/images/e/e0/The_Simple_Truth_about_the_Trinity.pdf Click here for a printable summary of this vision].


[http://en.believethesign.com/images/e/e0/The_Simple_Truth_about_the_Trinity.pdf Click here for a printable summary of this vision].
{{Bottom of Page}}
[[Category:Prophecies and Visions]]
[[Category:Prophecies]]
[[Category: Visions]]
[[Category: Doctrines]]
[[Category: Godhead]]