Did God change Saul's name to Paul?: Difference between revisions

    From BelieveTheSign
    (Created page with "{{Top of Page}} {{Bad Interpretation}} William Branham said that God changed Saul's name to Paul. Is this Biblically correct? =What does the Bible say?= As is well known, G...")
     
     
    (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    {{Top of Page}}
    {{Top of Page}}
    {{Bad Interpretation}}
    {{Bad Interpretation}}
    <br>
    William Branham said that God changed Saul's name to Paul.  Is this Biblically correct?
    William Branham said that God changed Saul's name to Paul.  Is this Biblically correct?


    =What does the Bible say?=
    =What does the Bible say?=


    As is well known, God prominently changed the names of two Old Testament patriarchs: Abram to Abraham (Gen. 17:5) and Jacob to Israel (Gen. 32:28).  William branham thought that something similar happened to Paul when he encountered Jesus on the Damascus Road (Acts 9).
    The Old Testament contains many examples of people’s names being changed to better fit their circumstances. God changed the names of Abram and Sarai to Abraham and Sarah (Gen 17:5, 15); He also changed Jacob’s name to Israel (Gen 32:28). Moses changed Hoshea’s name to Joshua (Num 13:16).<ref>John D. Barry et al., Faithlife Study Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016), Ru 1:20.</ref> William Branham thought that something similar happened to Paul when he encountered Jesus on the Damascus Road (Acts 9).


    There is no scriptural evidence, however, to support a name change for Saul/Paul. Here are six pieces of biblical evidence that prove the popular notion wrong:
    The suggestion that Saul’s name was changed to Paul at the time of his conversion has absolutely no support in the New Testament.<ref>C. E. B. Cranfield, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, International Critical Commentary (London; New York: T&T Clark International, 2004), 48.</ref>


    ==Jesus addresses him as “Saul, Saul” in Acts 9:4==
    Here are several examples that illustrate this


    Nothing in the narrative suggests Jesus subsequently changed Saul’s name. In Galatians 1:15–17, Paul speaks of being set apart before birth to preach to the Gentiles, but there is no mention of any name change.
    In Acts 9:4, we read:


    ==Ananias addresses him as “Saul” after his conversion==
    :''And falling to the ground, he heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?”<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Acts 9:4</ref>


    (Acts 9:17)
    Acts 9:17 states:


    There is no mention of a name change, and he is still calling him “Saul” after the christophany.
    :''So Ananias departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.”<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Ac 9:17.</ref>


    ==The Holy Spirit calls him “Saul” before his first missionary trip==
    Acts 13:2 says,


    Acts 13:2 says, “While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.’” It would be odd for the third person of the Trinity to keep calling this man by his “persecutor” name if the second person of the Trinity had changed it to his “apostle” name four chapters earlier.
    :''While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” <ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Ac 13:2.</ref>


    ==After the conversion experience, he is called “Saul” 11 more times==
    ==After Paul's conversion experience, he is called “Saul” 14 more times==


    Again, this would be odd if Jesus had changed his name to Paul.
    Please refer to:


    ==The decisive shift from “Saul” to “Paul” in Acts happens only once Paul sets off on his missionary journeys away from Jerusalem.==
    #Acts 9:8
    #Acts 9:11
    #Acts 9:17
    #Acts 9:19
    #Acts 9:22
    #Acts 9:24
    #Acts 9:26
    #Acts 11:25
    #Acts 11:30
    #Acts 12:25
    #Acts 13:1
    #Acts 13:2
    #Acts 13:7
    #Acts 13:9


    This subtle shift occurs in Acts 13:13: “Now Paul and his companions set sail.” The person who “changes” his name is not Jesus, but Luke.
    ==What caused the shift in the name?==


    ==Saul and Paul were two names for the same person all along==
    According to Knofel Staton:


    Acts 13:9 is the clincher: “But Saul, who was also called Paul, [was] filled with the Holy Spirit.” Here the converted person is being called both Saul and Paul—not “Saul the tyrant who was renamed Paul the Christian.Saul and Paul are dual names of one man, both before and after his conversion.
    :Saul is a Hebrew name. His mother probably named him after King Saul. Paul is a Greek name. Why two names? Because of the ethnic melting pot of the first century, many Jewish mothers gave their sons both Hebrew and Greek names at birth. That is probably what happened with Paul. We know that Saul was also known as Paul from Acts 13:9 as follows:


    ==Paul Is Saul==
    ::''Then Saul, who was also called Paul...<ref>The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Ac 13:9.</ref>


    As it turns out, “Saul”—derived from the famous first king of Israel, from the tribe of Benjamin, to which Saul/Paul himself belonged (Phil. 3:5)—is simply the Hebrew name for this person.  “Paul”—a normal koine name—is his Greek name, derived from the Latin surname Paulus.
    :It is interesting to note that Saul used his Hebrew name until he began to do ministry in the part of the world that was mostly populated by Greeks. It was when he started his missionary journeys that he used the name Paul. That would have been a better point of contact between him and the Greeks. It would have helped the Greeks to know that he was not trying to make Jews out of them. That name would also be accepted by the Jews in the Greek-populated world, for most Jews in the Greek-populated world also used their Greek names.


    For someone born in Tarsus (Acts 21:39) but educated under Gamaliel in Jerusalem (Acts 22:3) in a strict form of Pharisaism (Gal. 1:14; Phil. 3:5–6), this is not unusual. Much as many immigrants to English-speaking worlds take an Anglicized name on top of their ethnic name, many Greek-speaking Jews in Paul’s day would have a Jewish/Hebrew name and a Hellenistic/Greek name.
    :The name Paul literally means little. It is possible that his mother named him Paul because he was a small baby. Some writers do describe Paul as a short man.


    Here’s the smoking gun: When Paul recalls his conversion, he specifically notes that Jesus was “saying to me in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?’” (Acts 26:14). Paul draws attention to how Jesus addressed him in his Hebrew name, and makes no mention that it is now abandoned.
    :It is also possible that Saul gave himself the Greek name Paul as a self-imposed symbol of his humbleness. He saw himself as the least of the apostles and the chief of sinners (1 Corinthians 15:9; Ephesians 3:8; 1 Timothy 1:15). But those descriptions should not cause us to feel that Paul had an inferiority complex. Quite the contrary. He saw himself as someone who had been specially called by God. He saw himself as an apostle of Christ Jesus.<ref>Knofel Staton, Second Corinthians: Unlocking the Scriptures for You, Standard Bible Studies (Cincinnati, OH: Standard, 1988), 18–19.</ref>


    When Saul/Paul launches his Gentile-focused ministry among primarily Greek-speakers (beginning with Acts 13:9), it’s natural for Luke, the author of Acts, to begin referring exclusively to him by his Greek name. Nor is it surprising that he’s later referred to as “Paul” in Jerusalem, since there were Greek speakers there too. Indeed, Luke could be making a thematic point by shifting from Saul to Paul around chapter 13, given the broader theme of Acts (e.g., 1:8). After all, the church’s nucleus is shifting from predominantly Jewish-centered Jerusalem to the Greek-centered “ends of the earth,” such as Rome.
    =Conclusion=


    The apostle’s two names is not unique. Several other figures in the New Testament have two given names: Joseph, later called Barnabas (Acts 4:36); Simeon, also called Niger (Acts 13:1); and Thomas, also called Didymus (John 21:2); among others.
    There is no evidence that God changed Saul's name to Paul. Therefore, William Branham's interpretation is wrong.


    =Why It Matters=
    =Quotes of William Branham=


    Theological ideas not rooted in God’s Word—even if attractive and useful—are ultimately unwarranted. I can imagine how easy it is to draw powerful applications from the notion that Saul the persecutor met the risen Jesus and was so transformed that Jesus gave him a new name. That will preach, especially given how closely connected naming and identity are in Scripture. Nevertheless, without biblical evidence for such an idea, we should not use it. Even if it spoils the fun.
    Saul, good name, Saul was a king one time in Israel, but Saul didn't fit an apostle. Might be all right for a king, but not an apostle. '''So Jesus changed his name from what? From Saul to Paul.''' <ref>William Braham, 63-0318 - The First Seal, para. 282</ref>


    This principle applies well beyond this situation, of course. Another common error is the conflation of the magi with the shepherds at the manger. The magi were not there at the same time; they found Jesus months later. We can derive the right doctrine from the wrong text, and we can derive the wrong doctrine from the right text.


    As God’s people we should endeavor to read God’s Word closely and be as faithful to it as possible, in every area. Application that appears to draw on Scripture but isn’t actually scriptural—even if it’s “useful” or “cool”—can easily undermine someone’s faith once they realize they’ve been misled all along.<ref>This research is from Greg Lanier (PhD, Cambridge), who serves as assistant professor of New Testament and dean of students at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando. He is also an assistant pastor at River Oaks Church (PCA).</ref>
    ''Words, names, they have meanings. Many people don't believe that, but that's true. If names don't have some meaning, why did Abram's name have to be changed to Abraham? Why did Sarai have to be changed to Sarah? '''Why did Saul have to be changed to Paul?''' Why did Simon have to be changed to Peter? See, all these has meanings, everything has meanings.<ref>William Braham, 63-1214 - Why Little Bethlehem, para. 78</ref>


    =Quotes of William Branham=


    ''If there isn't something in a name, then why as long as Jacob was called Jacob, which means "supplanter, deceiver," that's what he was? But when he wrestled with the Lord all night, and the Lord changed his name, and about… when he was about sixty years old. He changed his name from—from—from Jacob to Israel, "a prince before God," and that's what he was. Why was Abram called… had to be called "Abraham" before the baby could be born? Why was Sarai called "Sarah" before the baby could be born?  
    ''If there isn't something in a name, then why as long as Jacob was called Jacob, which means "supplanter, deceiver," that's what he was? But when he wrestled with the Lord all night, and the Lord changed his name, and about… when he was about sixty years old. He changed his name from—from—from Jacob to Israel, "a prince before God," and that's what he was. Why was Abram called… had to be called "Abraham" before the baby could be born? Why was Sarai called "Sarah" before the baby could be born?  


    Why was Paul… or call… his name was Saul, but when he met Jesus, '''He changed him from Saul to "Paul.'''"<ref>William Braham, 63-1222 - God's Gifts Always Find Their Places, para. 47</ref>
    Why was Paul… or call… his name was Saul, but when he met Jesus, '''He changed him from Saul to "Paul.'''"<ref>William Braham, 63-1222 - God's Gifts Always Find Their Places, para. 47</ref>


    {{Bottom of Page}}
    {{Bottom of Page}}
    [[Category: Unfinished articles]]
    [[Category: Unfinished articles]]

    Latest revision as of 13:45, 22 May 2017

    Click on headings to expand them, or links to go to specific articles.

    Most message followers consider William Branham to be an infallible interpreter of scripture. It is the widely held view of message followers that, if we want to know what a passage of the Bible actually means, William Branham is the best source on all counts.

    When encountering a passage in scripture that seems to be at odds with William Branham's interpretation, message preachers generally encourage message followers to simply put it "on the shelf" until God reveals to them why William Branham has the correct view.

    But there are a number of biblical issues that William Branham seems to have messed up badly:

    You are currently on the article that is in bold.
    William Branham said that God changed Saul's name to Paul. Is this Biblically correct?

    What does the Bible say?

    The Old Testament contains many examples of people’s names being changed to better fit their circumstances. God changed the names of Abram and Sarai to Abraham and Sarah (Gen 17:5, 15); He also changed Jacob’s name to Israel (Gen 32:28). Moses changed Hoshea’s name to Joshua (Num 13:16).[1] William Branham thought that something similar happened to Paul when he encountered Jesus on the Damascus Road (Acts 9).

    The suggestion that Saul’s name was changed to Paul at the time of his conversion has absolutely no support in the New Testament.[2]

    Here are several examples that illustrate this

    In Acts 9:4, we read:

    And falling to the ground, he heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?”[3]

    Acts 9:17 states:

    So Ananias departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.”[4]

    Acts 13:2 says,

    While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” [5]

    After Paul's conversion experience, he is called “Saul” 14 more times

    Please refer to:

    1. Acts 9:8
    2. Acts 9:11
    3. Acts 9:17
    4. Acts 9:19
    5. Acts 9:22
    6. Acts 9:24
    7. Acts 9:26
    8. Acts 11:25
    9. Acts 11:30
    10. Acts 12:25
    11. Acts 13:1
    12. Acts 13:2
    13. Acts 13:7
    14. Acts 13:9

    What caused the shift in the name?

    According to Knofel Staton:

    Saul is a Hebrew name. His mother probably named him after King Saul. Paul is a Greek name. Why two names? Because of the ethnic melting pot of the first century, many Jewish mothers gave their sons both Hebrew and Greek names at birth. That is probably what happened with Paul. We know that Saul was also known as Paul from Acts 13:9 as follows:
    Then Saul, who was also called Paul...[6]
    It is interesting to note that Saul used his Hebrew name until he began to do ministry in the part of the world that was mostly populated by Greeks. It was when he started his missionary journeys that he used the name Paul. That would have been a better point of contact between him and the Greeks. It would have helped the Greeks to know that he was not trying to make Jews out of them. That name would also be accepted by the Jews in the Greek-populated world, for most Jews in the Greek-populated world also used their Greek names.
    The name Paul literally means little. It is possible that his mother named him Paul because he was a small baby. Some writers do describe Paul as a short man.
    It is also possible that Saul gave himself the Greek name Paul as a self-imposed symbol of his humbleness. He saw himself as the least of the apostles and the chief of sinners (1 Corinthians 15:9; Ephesians 3:8; 1 Timothy 1:15). But those descriptions should not cause us to feel that Paul had an inferiority complex. Quite the contrary. He saw himself as someone who had been specially called by God. He saw himself as an apostle of Christ Jesus.[7]

    Conclusion

    There is no evidence that God changed Saul's name to Paul. Therefore, William Branham's interpretation is wrong.

    Quotes of William Branham

    Saul, good name, Saul was a king one time in Israel, but Saul didn't fit an apostle. Might be all right for a king, but not an apostle. So Jesus changed his name from what? From Saul to Paul. [8]


    Words, names, they have meanings. Many people don't believe that, but that's true. If names don't have some meaning, why did Abram's name have to be changed to Abraham? Why did Sarai have to be changed to Sarah? Why did Saul have to be changed to Paul? Why did Simon have to be changed to Peter? See, all these has meanings, everything has meanings.[9]


    If there isn't something in a name, then why as long as Jacob was called Jacob, which means "supplanter, deceiver," that's what he was? But when he wrestled with the Lord all night, and the Lord changed his name, and about… when he was about sixty years old. He changed his name from—from—from Jacob to Israel, "a prince before God," and that's what he was. Why was Abram called… had to be called "Abraham" before the baby could be born? Why was Sarai called "Sarah" before the baby could be born?

    Why was Paul… or call… his name was Saul, but when he met Jesus, He changed him from Saul to "Paul."[10]


    Footnotes

    1. John D. Barry et al., Faithlife Study Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2016), Ru 1:20.
    2. C. E. B. Cranfield, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, International Critical Commentary (London; New York: T&T Clark International, 2004), 48.
    3. The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Acts 9:4
    4. The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Ac 9:17.
    5. The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Ac 13:2.
    6. The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Ac 13:9.
    7. Knofel Staton, Second Corinthians: Unlocking the Scriptures for You, Standard Bible Studies (Cincinnati, OH: Standard, 1988), 18–19.
    8. William Braham, 63-0318 - The First Seal, para. 282
    9. William Braham, 63-1214 - Why Little Bethlehem, para. 78
    10. William Braham, 63-1222 - God's Gifts Always Find Their Places, para. 47


    Navigation